Re: D + Qt + QtDesigner
On Thursday, 29 September 2022 at 00:46:36 UTC, Barbara wrote: On Wednesday, 28 September 2022 at 01:39:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: [...] Thank you Ali for mentioning our work. CopperSpice is licensed under LGPL 2.1 and provides a migration path for applications written in Qt. We support most all of the Qt 5 functionality with major improvements to strings, containers, and no longer requires MOC to implement run time reflection. [...] You support Android/iOS? If you don't, are the any blockers to supporting it or you just didn't get around to doing it/there wasn't much demand?
Re: D + Qt + QtDesigner
On Wednesday, 28 September 2022 at 01:39:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 9/27/22 16:21, Vladimir Marchevsky wrote: > Considering licensing model of Qt and political decisions of Qt > Foundation Those were the reasons why my friends Barbara and Ansel started CopperSpice: https://www.copperspice.com Ali Thank you Ali for mentioning our work. CopperSpice is licensed under LGPL 2.1 and provides a migration path for applications written in Qt. We support most all of the Qt 5 functionality with major improvements to strings, containers, and no longer requires MOC to implement run time reflection. We released CsDesigner earlier this year as a standalone program which is fully compatible with their UI files. DoxyPress is a code documentation generator based on Doxygen with full support for modern C++ and major improvements in the HTML output. If the D community would like to improve support for parsing D source code our team would be very excited to work with any interested developers. If anyone is interested in creating D bindings for CopperSpice we will gladly accept this up stream and help maintain it. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. Barbara
Re: D + Qt + QtDesigner
On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 23:21:07 UTC, Vladimir Marchevsky wrote: On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 21:07:25 UTC, Willian wrote: I would like to know if it is possible to gather the D community to work together on D + Qt + QtDesigner. I believe that the maturation of this library is the gateway for many programmers in the D language. Considering licensing model of Qt and political decisions of Qt Foundation, GTK looks much better. Also having C API GTK is probably much easier to use directly and efficiently rather than non-standard C++ of Qt. An extremely significant portion of Qt is available under GPL 3 nowadays, not sure if it's worth sticking with GTK purely for the license
