Ok, let's clear some things up.
#0: I do not represent Tango in any official capacity.
I am posting this because I can see this situation spinning out of
control and I just want everyone to stop trying to strangle each other.
Believe it or not, we're all (ostensibly) on the same side here.
lurker wrote:
FeepingCreature Wrote:
Phobos1 is shit. The Tango devs know this, the Phobos devs know it. Anyone
who denies it has never compared the Phobos and Tango sourcecode.
It's impossible to verify those claims because reading the Tango source might
taint one's mind and after
BCS wrote:
...
Maybe we need a std.arithmetic.* for all the a little more than just a
number types.
Phobos with subpackages?! Blasphemy! That's what those filthy Tango
heathens do and everyone knows that's just morally WRONG.
(Yes, I know about std.c.*.)
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Yigal Chripun yigal...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hl204m$m8...@digitalmars.com...
Starting with Vista, MS exposed the ability to have symlinks and hardlinks
on windows, just run help mklink in a cmd.exe.
In reality NTFS supported this for a long time now
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
strtr s...@spam.com wrote in message
news:hkuc5h$2hj...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
If you grab the Tango+DMD bundle from the Tango site, then it's exactly
the
same as installing DMD/Phobos: Just unzip, set path, and run.
So I shouldn't need to
torhu wrote:
On 10.07.2009 14:41, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
You can select the maximum visibility: private, protected or public.
(in the original UI in the plugin for Java there's also package,
but... where does package fall? private package protected?
protected package public? I think
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Ary Borenszweig escribió:
Hi all!
So... I've been playing around with generating ddocs from Descent.
phobos: http://downloads.dsource.org/projects/descent/ddoc/phobos/
Tango: http://downloads.dsource.org/projects/descent/ddoc/tango/
I've updated the docs. New
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Jason House:
Hardly. There seemed to mostly be complaints about it with Andrei
saying things like I can't believe you don't see the elegance of the
syntax. In the end, Andrei commented that he shouldn't involve the
community in such small
Ooooh... looks very nice. Thanks again, Walter. :)
Incidentally, the links to Final Switch Statement and Case Range
Statement in the changelog for 2.031 are broken.
Walter Bright wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Ooooh... looks very nice. Thanks again, Walter. :)
Actually, a lot of people worked on this release, not just me.
True; but it's getting harder to keep track of.
How about this? Thanks, mixin(reduce!a~`, `~b(D_CONTRIBUTORS)).
Raju Renjit. G wrote:
This paper gives a method to incorporate table like data types into any
programming languages (any language that does not have structs or classes,
for example fortran). When such a thing is done it is very easy to
incorporate SQL directly into the language. I mean I
Robert Fraser wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
The only way Flash will die if if at least the following happen:
...
5. Silverlight replaces it (and then we're all doomed).
Then we'd just be exchanging one problem for another (arguably) worse one.
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gv6ddk$1ko...@digitalmars.com...
Possessing a burning hatred of Flash isn't going to get everyone else to
stop using it. If that worked, we'd have killed off IE6 years ago.
Either build a better system
grauzone wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Obviously the large number of people using such sites are trying to
prove you wrong. :P
They just don't know it better. They probably think their PC isn't fast
enough for fullscreen video playback and so on.
Maybe they don't even know what's making
The subjects I did the best in and learned the most at uni were the ones
where I didn't *have* to take notes and could concentrate on what the
lecturer was trying to teach us.
Force students to take notes and the only thing they'll learn is how to
write fast.
-- Daniel
Walter Bright wrote:
Georg Wrede wrote:
That hit me too. I've been using PP or OO just because, never really
thinking. But there are some advantages to using a straight, long
document.
It's a /lot/ faster to create the presentation. You don't have to
split stuff into screenfulls (or fight
Walter Bright wrote:
...
o pdf renders a lot better than html. Why that should be, I don't know,
but it is obviously better.
I could be the old Mac feature. From what I recall, Apple is
fanatical about the on-screen display of something matching, as closely
as possible, the on-page
Awww! I wanna see how it ends!
:D
-- Daniel
Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
RangeExtra version 10^-20 is officially out. It consists of a small and
hopefully growing number of ranges that didn't make it into the new
Phobos
that I've gotten working reasonably well and I feel eventually belong
in Phobos.
Docs / What's there:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:24:59 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This has to go into object.d and be part of the runtime, where
std.range doesn't exist. There is nothing
BCS wrote:
Hello Christopher,
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
The absolute worst of all though is when an app (*cough* skype
*cough*) decides that close and the 'close' button should mean
don't close anything at all, but minimize to tray instead. That
should be a firing squad offense ;)
I'd
Walter Bright wrote:
cemiller wrote:
How about just making version and debug identifiers case-insensitive?
Aren't they already in their own special namespace; they're
special-case (pun intended).
Because then I have to explain why some identifiers are case sensitive
and some or not for
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
It's just you. g. The win32 build works fine for me.
Never mind, it looks to be related to some strange options my IDE is passing
to DMD.
Just tell it to stop passing -hcf [1].
-- Daniel
[1] HCF: Halt and Catch Fire, an
Christopher Wright wrote:
bearophile wrote:
What's the advantage of:
expect(foo(5), equals(3) | greaterThan(5));
Compared to:
expect(foo(5) == 3 | foo(5) 5);
What error message should that give?
The former gives:
Expected: equal to 3 or greater than 5
But was: whatever value foo(5)
Walter Bright wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 5 de marzo a las 11:37 me escribiste:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Compiling on linux from source is broken! Looks like you forgot to
include the total.h file!
You don't need it, I'll fix the makefile. total.h is for
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
One improvement from the language could come from dropping the parens
requirement for mixin, in which case:
mixin bitfields!
uint x : 2,
int y : 3,
uint z : 2,
bool flag : 1,
;
Have to resolve the
Walter Bright wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
I use mixins with CTFE functions WAY MORE than I use them with templates.
I'm not surprised. I feel the template mixins were probably a mistake.
Well, there's really a few things at play here:
1. I use templates for simple forward code generation
Georg Wrede wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Georg Wrede wrote:
And now a major gripe: I have just spent *half a day* trying to
figure out what's wrong when I try to use shebang with rdmd. I was
basically using hello.d with a shebang. And with rdmd I got this
peculiar error message:
.d'nnot
Max Samukha wrote:
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:05:28 +1100, Daniel Keep
daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Daniel Keep
daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
extern(C) void
Walter Bright wrote:
In Astoria, Oregon, on September 20-22 I'll be hosting a Compiler
Construction seminar along with Cristian Vlasceanu.
http://www.astoriaseminar.com/compiler-construction.html
It'll be a two day intensive course in how compilers work and how to
build them.
Curse
Sean Kelly wrote:
One somewhat weird issue that we may have to face at some point is that
Posix functions whose behavior was changed have had the symbol for the
new function changed to _blah$UNIX2003, with the old function left in
place. Since D can't declare symbols like this, we may end
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Yigal Chripunyigal...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with the above but there is still a small issue here:
A module is a single file and when you have several large classes
that are
tightly coupled you can get a very big file with thousands
Walter Bright wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Daniel Keep
daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote:
extern(C) void __identifier(blah$UNIX2003)(int);
A beneficial side-effect is that I can finally get rid of all those
mixins that are just doing this:
mixin
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
David Ferenczi Wrote:
I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
implementation of signals and
BCS wrote:
Reply to Bill,
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Daniel Keep
daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote:
You want to use JS to make the site more usable? That's great! But
you DO NOT break basic functionality to do it. EVER. If you can't
figure out how, you're not qualified
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
lol :)
Yeah, well, for a directory listing they could have shown the full tree,
but if it's too big then it's ugly, and browsing folder by folder (like
dsource) is slow for me.
The point is that instead of giving you a sub-optimal but functional
alternative, they
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.658.1233882921.22690.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions I'm not exaggerating when I say
that for a few months before I found that addon, using the web was so bad
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
New features:
- Compile-time view (Window - Show View - Other - D - Compile-time
View): allows you to see things from the compiler point of view, which
applies some transformations to the source code. For example you can see
what happens when you do a foreach, when
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:46:04 +0300, Jarrett Billingsley
jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Clay Smith clayasau...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion.
Bill Baxter wrote:
[snip]
in C# they use the same syntax as the c pre-processor for conditional
compilation and such even though C# doesn't have a pre-processor and the
syntax is interpreted by the compiler. the above would be something like:
void doSomething(T)(int i) {
if (i == 0)
40 matches
Mail list logo
