Robert Clipsham wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Great! Quick question - are you supporting or considering supporting
D2? I looked on the project's home page and couldn't find that
information. There's mention of druntime for D2 which makes me hopeful.
Thanks,
Andrei
D2 support in LDC
bearophile wrote:
Christian Kamm:
The release 0.9.1 of LDC, the LLVM based compiler for the D programming
language, contains the following major improvements:
Very good. I'll try this too.
* turn GC allocations to allocas if possible
Phobos1 of DMD too has alloca, so can this
bearophile wrote:
Frits van Bommel:
Thank you for your answers.
This one is only done for certain GC allocations by the way, not all of them.
The ones currently implemented are:
* new Struct/int/float/etc.,
* uninitialized arrays (used for arr1 ~ arr2, for instance),
* zero-initialized
bearophile wrote:
While this code:
typedef int Int2 = 2;
auto a = cast(int[])(new Int2[1000]);
Produces:
pushl %esi
subl$8, %esp
movl$1000, 4(%esp)
movl$_D20TypeInfo_ATmain4Int26__initZ, (%esp)
xorl%esi, %esi
call
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:20:03 +0400, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
struct Foo(A, B, C){
A[10] a;
B b;
C c;
void toString(Sink sink){
foreach(x; a) sink(x);
sink(b);
sink(c);
}
}
... but it's not, you have to create a silly buffer to put all your
strings in,
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
IMHO It'd be pretty nice for the standard formatting systems (both the
Tango and Phobos ones) to just call a standard Object method taking
(Sink sink, char[] format = null) on objects.
Probably we'll need that. You forgot the in though :o
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
This is a major revision to Phobos, including Andrei's revolutionary
new range support.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.029.zip
This is looking very nice! I want to switch from D1 to D2,
Daniel Keep wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
This is a major revision to Phobos, including Andrei's revolutionary
new range support.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.029.zip
This is looking very nice! I want to switch
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-04-20 00:38:48 -0400, Steve Teale steve.te...@britseyeview.com
said:
Michel Fortin Wrote:
What's the license?
Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.
By looking at the code, I've found a license. Not sure which license it
is (looks a
Walter Bright wrote:
Anders Bergh wrote:
You could probably make dmd run on some GNU/Darwin, but it's sort of
dead. There's http://www.puredarwin.org/ but I'm not sure if it
actually works yet. The iPhone is an ARM platform so dmd would
certainly not work there...
If dmd/phobos binaries for
Georg Wrede wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:51:57 +0300, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
[snip]
The ones I listen to are the ones who *are* using D and have some
sweat equity in it.
http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpresult/539369-138652
Bipolar folks
Walter Bright wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
The problem if it detects it in an implementation-defined manner is
the source code is no longer portable.
... If the result of compilation provably won't *run* anyway, what's
the problem with a compile-time error?
Nothing
Sean Kelly wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
extern(C) void __identifier(blah$UNIX2003)(int);
That would be awesome.
A beneficial side-effect is that I can finally get rid of all those
mixins that are just doing this:
mixin(`void `~name_of_fn~`(int a)
{
// ... rest of function ...
}`);
I had
Saaa wrote:
How do you generate the compile-time view?
Since Descent has a Java port of the DMD frontend inside, it probably
just runs the semantics passes on the AST and prints it back out...
14 matches
Mail list logo
