On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 22:32:37 UTC, Sativa wrote:
On Friday, 23 January 2015 at 11:04:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Mandatory reddit link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2tdy5z/interfacing_d_to_legacy_c_code_by_walter_bright/
There's been a lot of interest in this
On Friday, 23 January 2015 at 11:04:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Mandatory reddit link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2tdy5z/interfacing_d_to_legacy_c_code_by_walter_bright/
There's been a lot of interest in this topic.
Interesting...
I wonder if two things could happen:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 22:32:36 +, Sativa via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
What I mean is, Do we really need to know the default arguments
or are we just having to explicitly use them to make the name
mangling work?
If it is the latter, then surely couldn't the D compiler sort of
Thx for the feedback !
bug : https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14086
I worked around the name mangling issue with pragmas for now, a
new version is available here :
https://github.com/gchatelet/dlang_cpp_std/blob/5d52957372f7055b95d4f62ee6d9633bd620a61d/cpp_std.d
On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 04:08:56 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Walter Bright wrote in message
news:maed4o$2da6$1...@digitalmars.com...
So constructors and destructors are mangled 'a la D' instead
of the C++ way.
Please post this to bugzilla.
The problems with constructors go beyond
Walter how far did you get to integrate with the STL ?
I started writing std::vector and std::string (linux gcc
libstdc++) but maybe someone already made progress on this. It's
harder than I thought and will probably require a lot of work to
maintain all implementations.
On 1/29/15 4:30 AM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
Walter how far did you get to integrate with the STL ?
I started writing std::vector and std::string (linux gcc libstdc++) but
maybe someone already made progress on this. It's harder than I thought
and will probably require a lot of work to
I pushed some code for string here (nothing fancy yet)
https://github.com/gchatelet/dlang_cpp_std/blob/master/cpp_std.d
The linker complains about missing
std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar,
std::allocatorchar ::__ctor()
where it should be
std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar,
On 1/29/2015 1:58 PM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
I pushed some code for string here (nothing fancy yet)
https://github.com/gchatelet/dlang_cpp_std/blob/master/cpp_std.d
The linker complains about missing
std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar ::__ctor()
where it should
Walter Bright wrote in message news:maed4o$2da6$1...@digitalmars.com...
So constructors and destructors are mangled 'a la D' instead of the C++
way.
Please post this to bugzilla.
The problems with constructors go beyond mangling, so the current forced D
mangling is intentional to
Is it common for a C++ library you want to interface to, to use
std library types in its interface? Things like iterators or
maybe containers.
Do those hit any of the hard cases, so that you'd need to
change the std library to resolve the issue?
On Friday, 23 January 2015 at 11:04:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Mandatory reddit link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2tdy5z/interfacing_d_to_legacy_c_code_by_walter_bright/
There's been a lot of interest in this topic.
Great!
Mandatory reddit link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2tdy5z/interfacing_d_to_legacy_c_code_by_walter_bright/
There's been a lot of interest in this topic.
13 matches
Mail list logo
