Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Benjamin Thaut
Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip This zip does not contain the latest version of Optlink. The one at http://ftp.digitalmars.com/optlink.zip seems to be newer. Kind Regards Benjamin Thaut

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Walter Bright
On 10/14/2013 12:50 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote: Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip This zip does not contain the latest version of Optlink. The one at http://ftp.digitalmars.com/optlink.zip seems to be newer. That one is dated 04-10-13, while

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Benjamin Thaut
Am 14.10.2013 10:59, schrieb Walter Bright: On 10/14/2013 12:50 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote: Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip This zip does not contain the latest version of Optlink. The one at http://ftp.digitalmars.com/optlink.zip seems to be

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Rory McGuire
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.dewrote: My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month and then the year. Americans seem to read dates as October 14th, 2013 which is way they write numeric dates in such an odd way :D. Since I realized

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Benjamin Thaut
Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip Current list of regressions: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_severity=regressionbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENED This isn't a release candidate, in

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Benjamin Thaut
Am 14.10.2013 15:14, schrieb Benjamin Thaut: Am 13.10.2013 00:16, schrieb Walter Bright: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip Current list of regressions:

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread 1100110
On 10/14/2013 04:59 AM, Rory McGuire wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de mailto:c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote: My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month and then the year. Americans seem to read dates as October 14th,

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 10:00:01 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.dewrote: My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month and then the year. Americans seem to read dates as October 14th, 2013 which is

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread monarch_dodra
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 13:25:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote: I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd 2.063.2 and dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On 64-bit windows it works fine. This is really frustrating... I've encountered this too. I'll try to

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Walter Bright
On 10/14/2013 6:25 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote: I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd 2.063.2 and dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On 64-bit windows it works fine. This is really frustrating... Is it possible you are linking together code compiled with different

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Walter Bright
On 10/14/2013 2:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote: My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month and then the year. Yah, that is terribly confusing, especially considering the global intarnets. I tend to write dates as year-month-day, that way they sort properly in a directory

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread monarch_dodra
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 19:17:25 UTC, 1100110 wrote: *BOTH* of you write dates in an odd way. http://xkcd.com/1179/ Amen. ISO 8601 FTW. The Japanese got it correct natively though. It's year, then month then day, seperated either by explicit 年月日 (year, month, day), or by / or -. At

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread deadalnix
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 21:21:29 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote: On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 19:17:25 UTC, 1100110 wrote: *BOTH* of you write dates in an odd way. http://xkcd.com/1179/ Amen. ISO 8601 FTW. The Japanese got it correct natively though. It's year, then month then day,

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Monday, October 14, 2013 14:18:33 Walter Bright wrote: On 10/14/2013 2:35 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote: My bad. German dates... We write the the day first then the month and then the year. Yah, that is terribly confusing, especially considering the global intarnets. I tend to write

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread Kagamin
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 21:18:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Yah, that is terribly confusing, especially considering the global intarnets. I get bitten by it locally too: if there's a test with an inaccurate sql query with time formatted as string, the sql server doesn't always compute

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-14 Thread deadalnix
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 04:41:13 UTC, Kagamin wrote: On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 21:18:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Yah, that is terribly confusing, especially considering the global intarnets. I get bitten by it locally too: if there's a test with an inaccurate sql query with time

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-13 Thread Dmitry Olshansky
13-Oct-2013 05:29, Ivan Kazmenko пишет: On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 01:26:39 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote: The sizes of Phobos binaries increased by a third for every OS except FreeBSD, which seems to have remained the same (created 17 Feb 2013). Aside from the FreeBSD case which is most likely a

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-13 Thread Michal Minich
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip I found 2 issues: 1) Compile time almost doubled. Tested on vibe.d 28 seconds - dmd 2.063 + updated snn.lib 52 seconds - dmd 2.064 beta 2) Regression - After building vibe.d as a

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-13 Thread Namespace
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip Current list of regressions: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_severity=regressionbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENED This isn't a

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-13 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 11:27:12 Namespace wrote: DIP 37 causes problems: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/qlrfzafudnfuialnj...@forum.dlang.org#post-utjv lygdigsxtkgpfcny:40forum.dlang.org Then report the bug and mark it as a regression if it works with the previous release:

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-13 Thread Namespace
On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 09:44:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Sunday, October 13, 2013 11:27:12 Namespace wrote: DIP 37 causes problems: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/qlrfzafudnfuialnj...@forum.dlang.org#post-utjv lygdigsxtkgpfcny:40forum.dlang.org Then report the bug and mark it as

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-13 Thread Olivier Pisano
Found one issue : A call to std.functional.memoize crashes with the following error: object.Error: TypeInfo.compare is not implemented ./rossignol(const(pure nothrow @trusted int function(const(void*), const(void*))) object.TypeInfo_Struct.compare+0x3a) [0x89b3032]

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-13 Thread Walter Bright
On 10/13/2013 4:01 AM, Olivier Pisano wrote: Found one issue : A call to std.functional.memoize crashes with the following error: object.Error: TypeInfo.compare is not implemented ./rossignol(const(pure nothrow @trusted int function(const(void*), const(void*)))

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-12 Thread Tourist
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip Current list of regressions: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_severity=regressionbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENED This isn't a

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-12 Thread Ivan Kazmenko
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip Current list of regressions: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_severity=regressionbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENED This isn't a

Re: Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

2013-10-12 Thread Ivan Kazmenko
On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 01:26:39 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote: The sizes of Phobos binaries increased by a third for every OS except FreeBSD, which seems to have remained the same (created 17 Feb 2013). Aside from the FreeBSD case which is most likely a bug, is that an expected increase, or

<    1   2