dsimcha:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
I have given a first quick read to your
On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:37 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
On 4/12/2011 12:51 PM, bearophile wrote:
It might really be pure but not marked as such because the discipline required to
recursively mark it and all functions it calls pure doesn’t scale much better than
any other form of discipline in programming.
If an important module of Phobos as yours
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/10/2011 06:29 PM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's
On 11/04/2011 09:09, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/10/2011 06:29 PM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
On 04/11/2011 03:09 AM, Don wrote:
For sure, but it was not the only item. The recommendation is use 'that'
vs 'which' was an even more offensive item.
I found that rule to be very helpful to my writing.
Andrei
On 04/11/2011 03:26 AM, Alix Pexton wrote:
I have to agree with Don, burn the book, it is wholly responsible for
the decline in creativity in English writing (imho).
The book is for technical writing, and I didn't find absorbing it has
hurt in any way whatever creativity I may have.
Andrei
On 11/04/2011 12:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/11/2011 03:26 AM, Alix Pexton wrote:
I have to agree with Don, burn the book, it is wholly responsible for
the decline in creativity in English writing (imho).
The book is for technical writing, and I didn't find absorbing it has
hurt in
On 04/11/2011 07:31 AM, Alix Pexton wrote:
On 11/04/2011 12:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/11/2011 03:26 AM, Alix Pexton wrote:
I have to agree with Don, burn the book, it is wholly responsible for
the decline in creativity in English writing (imho).
The book is for technical writing,
On 04/11/2011 03:09 AM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/10/2011 06:29 PM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei
On 4/10/11 1:23 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:37 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[ . . . ]
I see. I go by Bugs in Writing (awesome book) and Strunk/White. They
both recommend the comma, no ifs and buts (hard for me to get used to
because in Romanian that comma is _never_
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:37 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[ . . . ]
I see. I go by Bugs in Writing (awesome book) and Strunk/White. They
both recommend the comma, no ifs and buts (hard for me to get used to
because in Romanian that comma is _never_ correct).
The bibles in this situation
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:inr5cq$m2e$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
Where?
Where could it ever
On 4/10/2011 7:29 PM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
dsimcha wrote:
On 4/10/2011 7:29 PM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a
Am 10.04.2011 00:27, schrieb Torarin:
2011/4/8 dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission yet,
but feedback would be appreciated.
On 04/10/2011 06:29 PM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
On 4/10/2011 8:28 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 10.04.2011 00:27, schrieb Torarin:
2011/4/8 dsimchadsim...@yahoo.com:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission yet,
but feedback would be
On 4/10/2011 8:28 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
After all the language bikeshedding I'll add something on-topic to this
thread ;)
I agree with Torarin: It's a very good article, I like how further
explanations are linked and I also wouldn't mind some more examples.
Can you please give some
On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
Made a few revisions,
On 4/9/11 3:03 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
On 4/9/11 5:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/9/11 3:03 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
yet, but feedback would be
On 04/09/2011 03:03 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
2011/4/8 dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission yet,
but feedback would be appreciated.
http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
A very good article!
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
Where?
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
Where?
Where could it ever be? After parallelism.
Andrei
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
Where?
Where could it ever be? After parallelism.
Andrei
Actually, I specifically remember
On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
Where?
Where could it ever be? After parallelism.
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
Just googled it now, it's quite a story. Found among other things a
Wikipedia page dedicated entirely to the topic!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma
Above all, it's your article, and one great thing about that is you
On 4/10/11, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
Just googled it now, it's quite a story. Found among other things a
Wikipedia page dedicated entirely to the topic!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma
Above all, it's your
Am 10.04.2011 04:27, schrieb dsimcha:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
Where?
Where could it ever be? After parallelism.
== Quote from Daniel Gibson (metalcae...@gmail.com)'s article
Am 10.04.2011 05:05, schrieb Andrej Mitrovic:
On 4/10/11, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
Just googled it now, it's quite a story. Found among other things a
Am 10.04.2011 04:27, schrieb dsimcha:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
Where?
Where could it ever be? After
Am 10.04.2011 06:04, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
Am 10.04.2011 04:27, schrieb dsimcha:
On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
Andrei
Where?
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
36 matches
Mail list logo
