On 2012-05-19 12:20, Paulo Pinto wrote:
As someone that has experience developing Eclipse plugins, I would say
that is more like a 1/4 of Eclipse or even less. :)
The UI framework is very little from the complete runtime infrastructure
that Eclipse offers.
That's why I added the smiley :)
On 2012-05-19 06:03, Andrew Wiley wrote:
Half of Eclipse ~4-6 years ago ported to D.
That certainly doesn't make it not useful, but DWT hasn't managed to
keep up with Eclipse.
I know, I know. Any help is welcome.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 26/03/2012 20:43, Adam Wilson wrote:
As to an IDE written in D, that's a HUGE project and well outside the
scope of what can be accomplished in a GSoC project. It takes millions
of lines of code to make a *DECENT* IDE.
I agree, this idea to write a proper, *fully-featured* IDE in D is
On 2012-05-18 19:20, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I agree, this idea to write a proper, *fully-featured* IDE in D is
simply totally unrealistic. If it's just a D editor with some IDE
functionality, sure, someone can toy around and try to work on that, but
as for a proper IDE, there is just so much
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-18 19:20, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I agree, this idea to write a proper, *fully-featured* IDE in D is
simply totally unrealistic. If it's just a D editor with some IDE
functionality, sure, someone can toy around and
On 2012-03-27 00:00, Adam Wilson wrote:
Mono is over a million, Visual Studio is almost as much as the Windows
Kernel (5m+ IIRC), and Eclipse ... well I don't what they are doing
wrong over there but the bloat is epic.
In other words, a good IDE is a massively complicated beast.
Integrations
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:38:33 -0700, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-03-27 00:00, Adam Wilson wrote:
Mono is over a million, Visual Studio is almost as much as the Windows
Kernel (5m+ IIRC), and Eclipse ... well I don't what they are doing
wrong over there but the bloat is epic.
In
On 2012-03-27 20:05, Adam Wilson wrote:
To be a fully useable *D* IDE this is true, but that's not really an
Integrated Development Environment, its just Yet Another Specialized
Development Environment. I'd argue that the whole point of the
Integrated part of IDE is that everything you might
On Tuesday, 27 March 2012 at 18:06:03 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Besides, Mono-D has more pressing issues than a potential
stand-alone IDE ... CTFE/mixin parsing anybody?
Well, I think the GSoC phase will be about implementing UFCS,
Mixin/Expression evaluation and CTFE then. Well cool, so I
We're very happy and honored to had Adam Wilson on board as a GSoC 2012
mentor. Adam brings solid project management experience and has a
specific interest in the Mono-D project.
Please join me in welcoming Adam to the ranks of GSoC mentors!
Thanks,
Andrei
On Monday, 26 March 2012 at 15:27:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We're very happy and honored to had Adam Wilson on board as a
GSoC 2012 mentor. Adam brings solid project management
experience and has a specific interest in the Mono-D project.
Please join me in welcoming Adam to the ranks
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:15:54 -0700, BLS bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
On Monday, 26 March 2012 at 15:27:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We're very happy and honored to had Adam Wilson on board as a GSoC 2012
mentor. Adam brings solid project management experience and has a
specific interest
On Monday, 26 March 2012 at 19:43:56 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I think that the best thing that we can do right now is to
focus on bringing the parser to completion. It's still missing
some key features of D, especially in terms of code-completion
and syntax highlighting. It's also missing
On 03/26/2012 01:11 PM, Kapps wrote:
And one of the very nice things about Mono-D is that the parser is
completely standalone. It would not be difficult to integrate into
Visual Studio in the future
Well, I am almost on Windows.(Not valid for all of us)
(AFAIK) almost everyting to integrate D
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:52:19 -0700, bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
On 03/26/2012 01:11 PM, Kapps wrote:
And one of the very nice things about Mono-D is that the parser is
completely standalone. It would not be difficult to integrate into
Visual Studio in the future
Well, I am almost on
Hi there,
Yeah I'm very grateful that Adam wants to be a mentor for GSoC
this year -
Nevertheless I'm still not sure which feature(s) I want to focus
- since there are so many features that sound interesting but are
obviously complex and time-intensive (like showing all possible
methods e.g.
Hi,
to make it absolutely sure !! I hope that Alex's project will make it.
(and as one who has worked on a concrete project with Alex, having
several private phone conversations, I am sure that Alex will deliver
pretty cool stuff. Most probably more than one might expect.)
On 03/26/2012
17 matches
Mail list logo
