Dear Dees,
Here is the article. I've set up a (temporary?) blog for it. The
article deals with the usability of D and how it helped to
solve certain problems. It's not about benchmarking, concurrency,
unit tests and the like. Just about how practical it is.
Here it is, warts and all:
It's a good why should I care about D article. I frequent
Hacker News, and one thing that seems to get people really hyped
about a language is Getting Things Done, as well as all the
functional programming hype.
One thing that caught my eye:
I also recommend the book The D Programming
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 13:53:24 UTC, Chris wrote:
Dear Dees,
Here is the article. I've set up a (temporary?) blog for it.
The article deals with the usability of D and how it helped
to solve certain problems. It's not about benchmarking,
concurrency, unit tests and the like. Just about
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 19:04:12 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/30/13 8:47 AM, Meta wrote:
It's a good why should I care about D article. I frequent
Hacker News,
and one thing that seems to get people really hyped about a
language is
Getting Things Done, as well as all the functional
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 14:21:06 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Chris:
http://wendlerchristoph.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/probably-d/
[Python] copyright issues (easily decompilable byte code)
Is that true?
For small D examples I suggest the Rosettacode site (when its
site isn't down).
Bye,
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 15:47:29 UTC, Meta wrote:
It's a good why should I care about D article. I frequent
Hacker News, and one thing that seems to get people really
hyped about a language is Getting Things Done, as well as all
the functional programming hype.
That was the reason why
On Tuesday, 30 July 2013 at 17:23:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Good one, worth sharing. As a D user I'd probably love to see
more technical details but for a wider public it is a solid
match.
The technical details are rather boring. Good old OOP and I made
use of D's structs and some other nice
