On 22.02.2013 21:22, Walter Bright wrote:
I just received this from Lloyd, who runs NWCPP:
-
Folks,
First off I would like to thank everyone who donated to our camera
drive. This month was the first session recorded using the new camera
setup and I
Am 22.02.2013 21:22, schrieb Walter Bright:
First off I would like to thank everyone who donated to our camera drive.
but they still missing a wireless microphone for the questioners :)
good talk - but i think you should be more clear about the target of
your presentation, its started with si
Walter Bright:
http://nwcpp.org/static/talks/2013/ComponentProgrammingInD.pdf
Thank you for the slides.
Regarding slide 38, in D code like this I often forget what's the
source and the destination:
foo.copy(bar);
A "copyTo" function name is more clear for me:
foo.copyTo(bar);
Regarding
Whoops, thought I was replying to the message from Lloyd that I saw in my
inbox earlier today.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Bill Baxter wrote:
> +1! Also might I suggest making NWCPP accounts on
> Facebook/Twitter/Google+ from which you can push out these sorts of
> announcements?
> The gr
+1! Also might I suggest making NWCPP accounts on Facebook/Twitter/Google+
from which you can push out these sorts of announcements?
The great thing about having the meeting announcements on those is that
people can really easily reshare them to all their followers, thereby
expanding the reach of
I just received this from Lloyd, who runs NWCPP:
-
Folks,
First off I would like to thank everyone who donated to our camera drive. This
month was the first session recorded using the new camera setup and I think you
will agree it is a BIG improve
On Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 03:05:42 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/19/2013 6:07 PM, MattCoder wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 23:49:17 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://nwcpp.org/
See ya there!
Will it be recorded?
Yes, but sometimes the recording goes awry or is of erratic
q
On 2/19/2013 6:07 PM, MattCoder wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 23:49:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://nwcpp.org/
See ya there!
Will it be recorded?
Yes, but sometimes the recording goes awry or is of erratic quality. It's not
done by an A/V professional.
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 23:49:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://nwcpp.org/
See ya there!
Will it be recorded?
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:49:16 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://nwcpp.org/
See ya there!
I'll be there!
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 at 21:40:06 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:59 PM, renoX wrote:
I have some mixed feeling about component programming: add in
all the
examples the requirement to give the context (line number for
example)
where something happened (either a match or an error)
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 at 19:11:55 UTC, Martin Friesen
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 at 01:40:05 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
The arti
On 10/03/2012 05:59 PM, renoX wrote:
I have some mixed feeling about component programming: add in all the
examples the requirement to give the context (line number for example)
where something happened (either a match or an error) and suddendly
component programming becomes much more "tricky"!!
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 at 01:40:05 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
The article contains a bug due to the pernicious behaviour of
seedless reduc
I have some mixed feeling about component programming: add in all
the examples the requirement to give the context (line number for
example) where something happened (either a match or an error)
and suddendly component programming becomes much more "tricky"!!
So for me component programming lo
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Nice article!
There, I found an interesting way of writing ranges that are not
explicitly initialized:
private import core.stdc.stdio;
struct StdinByChar {
@property
Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
guess that's necessary because structs doesn't have () ctors.
should be "don't"
ixid:
The article contains a bug due to the pernicious behaviour of
seedless reduce.
Hopefully Walter will be able to fix the article.
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 at 06:15:32 UTC, jerro wrote:
So I think the next *big* step from here, in D3 or some other
D-derived
language, would be easing the creation of ranges. For example,
a
special low-boilerplate syntax for creating bidirectional and
random-access ranges. Or for input (o
So I think the next *big* step from here, in D3 or some other
D-derived
language, would be easing the creation of ranges. For example, a
special low-boilerplate syntax for creating bidirectional and
random-access ranges. Or for input (or maybe even forward)
ranges, a
C#-style compile-time transf
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
The article contains a bug due to the pernicious behaviour of
seedless reduce.
This section:
"Just to show how flexible algorithms c
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 03:05:08 +0200
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 17:27:55 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in
> > _d/
>
> It's definitely the sort of article that we've needed to show what
> we're
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
The article contains a bug due to the pernicious behaviour of
seedless reduce.
This section:
Just to show how flexible algorithms ca
On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 17:27:55 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in
> _d/
It's definitely the sort of article that we've needed to show what we're trying
to do with ranges.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:27:55 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
>
Excellent article!
On 10/2/2012 2:51 PM, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
John D. Cook mentions Walter's talk in his blog post at
http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2012/10/02/pipelines-and-whirlpools/comment-page-1/#comment-249100
I've posted a link to this article in the comments, but it's awaiting
moderation.
I had dinner
Le 03/10/2012 00:45, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 10/2/12 6:14 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
Nice article!
I liked it the most of all
On 10/2/12 6:14 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
Nice article!
I liked it the most of all I've read from Walter.
Andrei
On 10/2/12, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
> John D. Cook mentions Walter's talk in his blog post at
> http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2012/10/02/pipelines-and-whirlpools/comment-page-1/#comment-249100
He also mentions there might be a video coming up of the event. If
that's true, yay!
Nice article, too!
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
Nice article!
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
John D. Cook mentions Walter's talk in his blog post at
http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2012/10/02/pipelines-and-whirlpools/comment-page-1
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:51:45 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:27:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
John D. Cook mentions Walter's talk in his blog post at
http://www.j
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/10u6sk/component_programming_in_d/
Andrei
33 matches
Mail list logo
