On Wednesday, 31 March 2021 at 03:24:37 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 31/03/2021 7:28 AM, Chris Piker wrote:
Get something solid that people want to use, then it doesn't
matter about how many people are available to maintain it.
This is good advice. I'm probably too used to organizations
On 31/03/2021 7:28 AM, Chris Piker wrote:
Since I'm not orphaning packages soon and since physical science
packages have a relatively small user base, it sounds like interaction
with the dlang-community group is not recommended at this time.
It is neither not recommended, nor recommended.
On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 17:40:15 UTC, mw wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 07:51:17 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
https://github.com/dlang-community/discussions/issues
But there is not much going on in DlangScience, right now there
is no real package maintained. The dlang-community intention
On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 07:51:17 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
Other than rudely posting an issue @
https://github.com/DlangScience/NetCDF-D, does anyone know the
right way to start a conversation with DlangScience? I'm
trying to blend in and learn this community's norms.
try also:
On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 04:34:48 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
As far as I know its not actively used. Both teams and the
discussion feature Github offers them.
And yes I did try to make it public, that wasn't an option.
Hi Rikki
Thank you for trying to make it public, it's appreciated.
On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 02:55:27 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
"A visible team can be seen and @mentioned by every member of
this organization."
Does this [hiding to non org members] really help D's
visibility and adoption? What sorts of things are discussed
that do not benefit from
On 30/03/2021 3:55 PM, James Blachly wrote:
Does this [hiding to non org members] really help D's visibility and
adoption? What sorts of things are discussed that do not benefit from
openness? For example, I am a bona fide scientist using Dlang, but had
no idea dlang-science was even an active
On 3/28/21 8:58 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 29/03/2021 12:16 PM, Chris Piker wrote:
On Sunday, 28 March 2021 at 04:06:57 UTC, mw wrote:
On Friday, 26 March 2021 at 21:55:18 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
Let's discuss it here:
https://github.com/orgs/dlang-community/teams/science/discussions
On Monday, 29 March 2021 at 00:58:46 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 29/03/2021 12:16 PM, Chris Piker wrote:
On Sunday, 28 March 2021 at 04:06:57 UTC, mw wrote:
On Friday, 26 March 2021 at 21:55:18 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
Let's discuss it here:
On 29/03/2021 12:16 PM, Chris Piker wrote:
On Sunday, 28 March 2021 at 04:06:57 UTC, mw wrote:
On Friday, 26 March 2021 at 21:55:18 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
Let's discuss it here:
https://github.com/orgs/dlang-community/teams/science/discussions
@wilzbach is the maintainer of the group.
On Sunday, 28 March 2021 at 22:25:03 UTC, russhy wrote:
Interestingly Github flags this repo as a "C" repo , with the
balance of code tilting slightly (>51%) in favor of C (perhaps
headers), compared to D. I wonder to what degree this affects
overall stats of # Dlang repos on Github?
this
On Sunday, 28 March 2021 at 04:06:57 UTC, mw wrote:
On Friday, 26 March 2021 at 21:55:18 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
Let's discuss it here:
https://github.com/orgs/dlang-community/teams/science/discussions
@wilzbach is the maintainer of the group.
Sounds good to me, but the link above returns a
Interestingly Github flags this repo as a "C" repo , with the
balance of code tilting slightly (>51%) in favor of C (perhaps
headers), compared to D. I wonder to what degree this affects
overall stats of # Dlang repos on Github?
this can be "fixed" using a .gitattribute file with the
On Friday, 26 March 2021 at 21:55:18 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
Hi DlangScience
I've setup D prototypes for the CDF (Common Data Format) file
reading/writing library. Since it's mostly just basic D
prototypes for a C library the module's name is deimos.cdf and
can be found here:
On 3/26/21 5:55 PM, Chris Piker wrote:
Hi DlangScience
I've setup D prototypes for the CDF (Common Data Format) file
reading/writing library. Since it's mostly just basic D prototypes for
a C library the module's name is deimos.cdf and can be found here:
Hi DlangScience
I've setup D prototypes for the CDF (Common Data Format) file
reading/writing library. Since it's mostly just basic D
prototypes for a C library the module's name is deimos.cdf and
can be found here: https://github.com/das-developers/deimos.cdf
I'm attempting to get the
16 matches
Mail list logo
