Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
On Wednesday, 26 March 2014 at 06:35:56 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
If you are programming on win32,now,DFL can be used by D2.065.
Please git clone http://github.com/FrankLike/dfl
Open the folder w32 -dflexe double click the 'makedflexe.bat'
file,after some seconds ,press the 'Enter key' ,after some
seconds,dfl.lib,dfl.exe are all in you d install folders('lib'
and 'bin') ,that's all ok.
Thanks Christopher E. Miller.
You should make your changes into a pull request. Most people
using DFL are tracking Rayerd's repo.
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
On Thursday, 27 March 2014 at 07:39:47 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote: Is there somebody maintaining the GTK branch of DFL? No.
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
On Sunday, 30 March 2014 at 11:53:55 UTC, xx xx wrote: it doesn't work for 64bit. will you fix that too? On Sunday, 30 March 2014 at 09:08:17 UTC, FrankLike wrote: Hi,every one. I fork a new dfl from https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl we should keep the origin code is refresh. I find the error in DMD 2.065 is: becase the base.d(403) ,dfl is not work. I have modified it. Please look it :https://github.com/Franklike/dfl Thank you who use it. Christopher E. Miller,thank you. What's the status on this?
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
Hi,every one. I fork a new dfl from https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl we should keep the origin code is refresh. I find the error in DMD 2.065 is: becase the base.d(403) ,dfl is not work. I have modified it. Please look it :https://github.com/Franklike/dfl Thank you who use it. Christopher E. Miller,thank you.
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
it doesn't work for 64bit. will you fix that too? On Sunday, 30 March 2014 at 09:08:17 UTC, FrankLike wrote: Hi,every one. I fork a new dfl from https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl we should keep the origin code is refresh. I find the error in DMD 2.065 is: becase the base.d(403) ,dfl is not work. I have modified it. Please look it :https://github.com/Franklike/dfl Thank you who use it. Christopher E. Miller,thank you.
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
On Wednesday, 26 March 2014 at 06:35:56 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
If you are programming on win32,now,DFL can be used by D2.065.
Please git clone http://github.com/FrankLike/dfl
Open the folder w32 -dflexe double click the 'makedflexe.bat'
file,after some seconds ,press the 'Enter key' ,after some
seconds,dfl.lib,dfl.exe are all in you d install folders('lib'
and 'bin') ,that's all ok.
Thanks Christopher E. Miller.
I've had a look at DFL and it looks quite good but, looking thru
the API, I can't see anywhere to draw a filled ellipse - Am I
missing something?
Regards,
-=mike=-
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
I've had a look at DFL and it looks quite good but, looking thru the API, I can't see anywhere to draw a filled ellipse - Am I missing something? Regards, -=mike=- https://github.com/FrankLIKE/dfl-examples-d2.git paint.d will help you. Seiji Fujita,thank you.
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
FrankLike 1150015...@qq.com wrote in message news:btajmssaimcexmnvg...@forum.dlang.org... I've had a look at DFL and it looks quite good but, looking thru the API, I can't see anywhere to draw a filled ellipse - Am I missing something? Regards, -=mike=- https://github.com/FrankLIKE/dfl-examples-d2.git paint.d will help you. Seiji Fujita,thank you. Hi, I had a look at paint.d in the examples - this example deals with drawing an icon. I also looked at draw.d - this deals with drawing to the canvas - the only filled shapes are the rectangular ones (fillRectangle) - there is no equivalent fillEllipse. Checking the drawing.d file shows no filled ellipse drawing functions. The ellipse functions are explicitely drawn without filling. It might need a lib addition :-) Regards, -=mike=-
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
Is there somebody maintaining the GTK branch of DFL? -- Jordi Sayol
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
On Thursday, 27 March 2014 at 07:32:38 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On 3/27/2014 10:57 AM, FrankLike wrote: On Wednesday, 26 March 2014 at 10:42:09 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: On 3/26/14, FrankLike 1150015...@qq.com wrote: If you are programming on win32,now,DFL can be used by D2.065. Please git clone http://github.com/FrankLike/dfl Open the folder w32 -dflexe double click the 'makedflexe.bat' FYI: you've changed one hardcoded path to another. I also don't understand the removal of the package module. Anywho I don't use DFL much. : package module Let the all.d is null,most of codes have used the dfl.all,so keep all.d and remove package.d ,that's ok. thank you. It's fine to keep both. Old code (if any of it out there still compiles) can continue to use dfl.all, while new projects can make user of the newer package.d. The *.all technique should be deprecated in old projects like this, IMO, not encouraged. Thank you,Mike Sorry,I test the newer package.d ,but it's not work. Error 42:Symbol Undefined _D3dfll2__ModuleInfoZ Can you contact the Christopher E. Miller? He should keep continue his work,it's very good. Thank you again.
DFL can be used by D2.065
If you are programming on win32,now,DFL can be used by D2.065.
Please git clone http://github.com/FrankLike/dfl
Open the folder w32 -dflexe double click the 'makedflexe.bat'
file,after some seconds ,press the 'Enter key' ,after some
seconds,dfl.lib,dfl.exe are all in you d install folders('lib'
and 'bin') ,that's all ok.
Thanks Christopher E. Miller.
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
On 3/26/14, FrankLike 1150015...@qq.com wrote: If you are programming on win32,now,DFL can be used by D2.065. Please git clone http://github.com/FrankLike/dfl Open the folder w32 -dflexe double click the 'makedflexe.bat' FYI: you've changed one hardcoded path to another. I also don't understand the removal of the package module. Anywho I don't use DFL much. :
Re: DFL can be used by D2.065
On Wednesday, 26 March 2014 at 10:42:09 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: On 3/26/14, FrankLike 1150015...@qq.com wrote: If you are programming on win32,now,DFL can be used by D2.065. Please git clone http://github.com/FrankLike/dfl Open the folder w32 -dflexe double click the 'makedflexe.bat' FYI: you've changed one hardcoded path to another. I also don't understand the removal of the package module. Anywho I don't use DFL much. : package module Let the all.d is null,most of codes have used the dfl.all,so keep all.d and remove package.d ,that's ok. thank you.
