never say they are the same; you say
similar. Nothing is wrong with that. :)
Ali
This is excellent information on functional programming with D. I
would love to see a lot more information in this area - perhaps a
much longer article covering in more detail - and also covering
what is missing
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 06:45 +, Kingsley via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[…]
This is excellent information on functional programming with D. I
would love to see a lot more information in this area - perhaps a
much longer article covering in more detail - and also covering
what
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1clufn/functional_programming_with_d/
Andrei
On Sunday, 14 April 2013 at 06:35:53 UTC, qznc wrote:
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:38:24 -0700: Ali Çehreli wrote
[...]
When it is a reference though, not immutable but D's const is
similar to
C's const. Otherwise, there is the following difference:
// in C: I have no idea whether c is immutable
On 04/13/2013 11:35 PM, qznc wrote:
D's immutable is similar to C's const only when we are talking about
values:
const int c_i = 42;// in C immutable d_i = 42;// in D
When it is a reference though, not immutable but D's const is similar to
C's const. Otherwise, there is the
I wrote a small article to summarize D's suitability for functional
programming.
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/articles/functional_D.html
Feedback welcome! :)
On Saturday, 13 April 2013 at 12:29:29 UTC, qznc wrote:
Feedback welcome! :)
You wrote:
While there is no syntactic sugar,
What about lambdas?
http://dlang.org/expression.html#Lambda
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 15:03:51 +0200: Vladimir Panteleev wrote
On Saturday, 13 April 2013 at 12:29:29 UTC, qznc wrote:
While there is no syntactic sugar,
What about lambdas?
http://dlang.org/expression.html#Lambda
Oh. I forgot about those. Thanks!
The syntactic sugar seems to be quite
On 04/13/2013 05:25 PM, qznc wrote:
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 15:03:51 +0200: Vladimir Panteleev wrote
On Saturday, 13 April 2013 at 12:29:29 UTC, qznc wrote:
While there is no syntactic sugar,
What about lambdas?
http://dlang.org/expression.html#Lambda
Oh. I forgot about those. Thanks!
The
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:46:10 +0200: Timon Gehr wrote
On 04/13/2013 05:25 PM, qznc wrote:
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 15:03:51 +0200: Vladimir Panteleev wrote
On Saturday, 13 April 2013 at 12:29:29 UTC, qznc wrote:
While there is no syntactic sugar,
What about lambdas?
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 15:03:51 +0200: Vladimir Panteleev wrote
On Saturday, 13 April 2013 at 12:29:29 UTC, qznc wrote:
Feedback welcome! :)
You wrote:
While there is no syntactic sugar,
What about lambdas?
http://dlang.org/expression.html#Lambda
I added them to the article and
Timon Gehr:
auto square6 = x = x*x;
no. (valid grammar, but you need some type annotation.)
In theory a syntax like:
alias square6 = x = x * x;
Can be a shorthand for a template function like:
auto square6(T0)(T0 x) { return x * x; }
Bye,
bearophile
On 04/13/2013 05:29 AM, qznc wrote:
I wrote a small article to summarize D's suitability for functional
programming.
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/articles/functional_D.html
Feedback welcome! :)
Nice article; thanks. :)
Some quotes from the article and some notes:
1) can qualify variables as
13 matches
Mail list logo
