Re: Lost in Translation: Encapsulation

2018-11-06 Thread Dennis via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 15:14:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: [...] I noticed that the `export` visibility attribute is curiously not mentioned anywhere in the article. I suppose it is not relevant to the encapsulation story, but it is weird to see it in the spec

Re: Lost in Translation: Encapsulation

2018-11-06 Thread 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d-announce
. The blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2018/11/06/lost-in-translation-encapsulation/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9up2yo/lost_in_translation_encapsulation_in_d/ You just describe how package access attribute works better then the spec itself! Good job. -Alex

Re: Lost in Translation: Encapsulation

2018-11-06 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
. The blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2018/11/06/lost-in-translation-encapsulation/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9up2yo/lost_in_translation_encapsulation_in_d/ Nicely done, think this could do well on proggit/HN/lobste.rs.

Re: Lost in Translation: Encapsulation

2018-11-06 Thread David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d-announce
://dlang.org/blog/2018/11/06/lost-in-translation-encapsulation/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9up2yo/lost_in_translation_encapsulation_in_d/ As usual, an excellent bit of writing containing things I wasn't aware of. Thanks!

Lost in Translation: Encapsulation

2018-11-06 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
Last week, inspired by another discussion in these forums about D's private-to-the-module form of encapsulation, I spent a few hours putting a new article together for the blog. Ali, Joakim, Nicholas helped me get it in shape. The blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2018/11/06/lost-in-translation