Just finished making the parser analyze UDA syntax flawlessly +
Slight profiling statistics display support (dmd exclusive,
unfortunately).
Ah, before I forget it: No, the 'deprecated' attribute syntax à la
[...] void foo() {}
is not supported, only
@... void bar() {}
:-)
On Sunday, 6 January 2013 at 17:10:17 UTC, alex wrote:
Just finished making the parser analyze UDA syntax flawlessly +
Slight profiling statistics display support (dmd exclusive,
unfortunately).
Ah, before I forget it: No, the 'deprecated' attribute syntax à
la
[...] void foo() {}
is not
On Sunday, 6 January 2013 at 17:15:30 UTC, nazriel wrote:
On Sunday, 6 January 2013 at 17:10:17 UTC, alex wrote:
Just finished making the parser analyze UDA syntax flawlessly
+ Slight profiling statistics display support (dmd exclusive,
unfortunately).
Ah, before I forget it: No, the
Oh, no you actually can type
deprecated(Don't do this because!) void oldFoo() {}
now.
You can? Wow, yet another change that was not in the docs? I'm becoming
bitter, here.
With the 'deprecated' attribute syntax I meant this [..] attribute syntax,
nothing else. :)
OK.
Good job,
On Sunday, 6 January 2013 at 17:18:33 UTC, alex wrote:
On Sunday, 6 January 2013 at 17:15:30 UTC, nazriel wrote:
On Sunday, 6 January 2013 at 17:10:17 UTC, alex wrote:
Just finished making the parser analyze UDA syntax flawlessly
+ Slight profiling statistics display support (dmd exclusive,
On Sunday, 6 January 2013 at 17:37:05 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Oh, no you actually can type
deprecated(Don't do this because!) void oldFoo() {}
now.
You can? Wow, yet another change that was not in the docs? I'm
becoming
bitter, here.
With the 'deprecated' attribute syntax I meant
