On Fri, 10 May 2013 14:32:48 +0200
deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up creating
a generic solution and wrote an article about it.
Nice article, but
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 18:30:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 14:32:48 +0200
deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up
creating a
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 19:23:45 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 17:56:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A general note about posting to reddit: it often happens that
posts from infrequent posters go to spam by means of some
automatic rule. When that happens you need to
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up creating
a generic solution and wrote an article about it.
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:32:50 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up
creating a generic solution and wrote an article about it.
Fancy some proof-reading again?
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:47:17 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:32:50 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up
creating a generic solution and
10-May-2013 16:32, deadalnix пишет:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up creating a
generic solution and wrote an article about it.
Neat but somewhat limited.
E.g. this is exactly the
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 13:04:58 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:47:17 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:32:50 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 13:11:37 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
E.g. this is exactly the same switch madness we sought to avoid:
The article don't plan to avoid this, but to make the tagged
union safe. I agree this is a plus, but didn't really took time
to make that work.
void
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 13:51:11 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Is this on Reddit yet?
No, feel free to put it if you think it is appropriate !
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1e2h99/type_safe_tagged_union_in_d/
Someone else did.
On 5/10/13 8:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up creating a
generic solution and wrote an article about it.
Article is good, could use a few copyediting fixes
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 13:51:11 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Awesome, I'll update the article.
Andrei pointed out that the title needed fixing:
I suggest:
Type-safe tagged unions in the D programming language.
Type-safe tagged unions in D.
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 14:37:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/10/13 8:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up
creating a
generic solution and wrote an
On 05/10/13 14:32, deadalnix wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up creating a generic
solution and wrote an article about it.
Nothing 'shameless' about it.
But Real Programmers
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 14:53:23 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 13:51:11 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Awesome, I'll update the article.
Andrei pointed out that the title needed fixing:
I suggest:
Type-safe tagged unions in the D programming language.
Type-safe tagged unions
W dniu 10.05.2013 14:32, deadalnix pisze:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up creating a
generic solution and wrote an article about it.
Here's my try on this:
On 5/10/13 1:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/10/13 10:15 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 13:51:11 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Is this on Reddit yet?
No, feel free to put it if you think it is appropriate !
On 5/10/2013 10:56 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
A general note about posting to reddit: it often happens that posts from
infrequent posters go to spam by means of some automatic rule. When that happens
you need to message the moderators and politely ask them to manually instate the
post
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 17:56:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
A general note about posting to reddit: it often happens that
posts from infrequent posters go to spam by means of some
automatic rule. When that happens you need to message the
moderators and politely ask them to manually
On 05/10/2013 02:32 PM, deadalnix wrote:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programming-language/
A trick that I used to use more and more, so I ended up creating a
generic solution and wrote an article about it.
I'd have implemented your TaggedUnion struct as
20 matches
Mail list logo
