Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-24 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 18:36:11 UTC, Joakim wrote: Vladimir mentioned that there's a Musl port to wasm, have you tried it? https://github.com/jfbastien/musl Druntime and ldc support Musl. Thanks for the link, I will have a look at it!

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-23 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 18:36:11 UTC, Joakim wrote: Vladimir mentioned that there's a Musl port to wasm, have you tried it? My knowledge of the intersection of Musl and WASM is that Musl is used as the libc in Emscripten (and, as extension, in Dscripten), and Emscripten/Dscripten can

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-23 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 17:53:32 UTC, Suliman wrote: What do you think of the struct approach compared to a traditional jsx/virtual-dom? jsx is sucks. Look at Vue.js way, if you will able to fo you framework Vue-style it will be perfect! The reason I made this wasm experiment was not

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-23 Thread aberba via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:51:48 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 14:54:29 UTC, aberba wrote: Can the SPA code be released as a separate module for WebAssembly web app development? Currently the whole thing is not so developer-friendly, it was just the

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-23 Thread Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 17:53:32 UTC, Suliman wrote: What do you think of the struct approach compared to a traditional jsx/virtual-dom? jsx is sucks. Look at Vue.js way, if you will able to fo you framework Vue-style it will be perfect! Being a Vue user for three years now, I

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-23 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:51:48 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 14:54:29 UTC, aberba wrote: [...] Currently the whole thing is not so developer-friendly, it was just the easiest way for me to get it up and running. [...] Vladimir mentioned that

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-23 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
What do you think of the struct approach compared to a traditional jsx/virtual-dom? jsx is sucks. Look at Vue.js way, if you will able to fo you framework Vue-style it will be perfect!

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-22 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 14:54:29 UTC, aberba wrote: Can the SPA code be released as a separate module for WebAssembly web app development? Currently the whole thing is not so developer-friendly, it was just the easiest way for me to get it up and running. Right now I am trying to

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-22 Thread aberba via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 14:01:30 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: Hey guys, Following the D->emscripten->wasm toolchain from CyberShadow and Ace17 I created a proof of concept framework for creating single page webassembly applications using D's compile time features. This is a proof

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-22 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 14:01:30 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: Hey guys, Following the D->emscripten->wasm toolchain from CyberShadow and Ace17 I created a proof of concept framework for creating single page webassembly applications using D's compile time features. This is a proof

Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-21 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
Hey guys, Following the D->emscripten->wasm toolchain from CyberShadow and Ace17 I created a proof of concept framework for creating single page webassembly applications using D's compile time features. This is a proof of concept to find out what is possible. At