Re: arsd 11 progress report - scheduled for release in May
On Friday, 21 April 2023 at 12:52:28 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote: Almost everything. It is much simpler to use... Heck I'm game. My current project is too heavily dependent on vibe.d to change now, but I do have another coming up in the near future (~6 months) that has similar needs. I'll give arsd a whirl for that one. I've found your code easy to read in the past and am looking forward to trying it out.
Re: arsd 11 progress report - scheduled for release in May
On Friday, 21 April 2023 at 02:34:10 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
A cursory reading of the cgi module indicates that arsd provide
some of the same functionality of vibe.d, but uses
multi-processes or multi-threads instead of fibers. Is that
true?
It actually does a lot more than that, including a fiber impl too
(the -version=embedded_httpd_hybrid)
Also, how do you keep DB requests from getting munged together
on the same DB connection socket when using arsd.cgi with
arsd.database?
You don't use the same db connection socket. You have a separate
one per worker.
The way I usually do it is:
---
Database getDb() {
static Database db;
if(db is null)
db = new WhicheverImpl(args);
return db;
}
---
So you get a thread-local cache, recreated whenever needed. This
works reliably in all current modes. (I might be adding a new
mode in version 11 that works differently, but I'll add a new
helper function for that if I do).
In general what would you say are the advantages of using
arsd.cgi over vibe.d (other then simplicity of course).
Almost everything. It is much simpler to use, has more library
compatibility, better performance (both compiles faster and
serves faster), more stability (both fewer bugs and more long
term api support), more features though there's a few places
vibe might have something I don't (like there's a redis lib on
their end, tho odds are you can use their lib in my system lol),
I have most things they have and some things they don't (like my
html form generators).
Re: arsd 11 progress report - scheduled for release in May
On Tuesday, 21 March 2023 at 21:30:59 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote: I haven't written much in the blog lately but I tried to catch up a little this week with a progress report of the code I intend to release in a couple more months. http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2023_03_20.html Hi Adam A cursory reading of the cgi module indicates that arsd provide some of the same functionality of vibe.d, but uses multi-processes or multi-threads instead of fibers. Is that true? Also, how do you keep DB requests from getting munged together on the same DB connection socket when using arsd.cgi with arsd.database? In general what would you say are the advantages of using arsd.cgi over vibe.d (other then simplicity of course). Also, if I should be posting these questions in some other forum, just let me know which one and I'll switch over. Thanks,
Re: arsd 11 progress report - scheduled for release in May
On Tuesday, 21 March 2023 at 21:30:59 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote: I haven't written much in the blog lately but I tried to catch up a little this week with a progress report of the code I intend to release in a couple more months. http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2023_03_20.html Good luck with the restructuring of your project; or, would you call it differently?
arsd 11 progress report - scheduled for release in May
I haven't written much in the blog lately but I tried to catch up a little this week with a progress report of the code I intend to release in a couple more months. http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2023_03_20.html
