On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 20:24:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/25/2013 6:15 AM, eles wrote:
Breaking peoples' build scripts and makefiles is not nice :-)
On the same grounds, you could recommend them dmc.
Provide, at least, a flag that passes the file without name
change, for example:
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 15:57:27 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:24:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright
When was decided to add this? I would love it, but I cannot
remember that this was decided.
Well, like many other id
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
Provide, at least, a flag that passes the file without name change, for example:
dmd -ntest
will really pass "test" file and not test.d.
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
This forces scrpts to bear the .d extension. For example, if you
write a script on Linux named "git-test" and you put at the top:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 02:21:37 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
The explanation is quite simple. LLVM understand C and C++
runtime. It doesn't understand D runtime (LDC is doing some
work in that regard, but it is still limited). So you see a
difference between C and C++ as some optimization wil
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
Thanks for the clear explanation. It makes a lot of sense. Let me think about it
for a bit.
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
Thank you for considering it.
On 10/25/2013 03:50 AM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
It depends.
Two benchmarks of different languages and compilers:
http://togototo.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/benchmarking-level-generation-go-rust-haskell-and-d/
http://togototo.wordpress.com/2013/08/23/benchmarks-round-two-parallel-go-rust-d-scala-and
On 10/25/2013 03:50 AM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
It depends.
Two benchmarks of different languages and compilers:
http://togototo.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/benchmarking-level-generation-go-rust-haskell-and-d/
http://togototo.wordpress.com/2013/08/23/benchmarks-round-two-parallel-go-rust-d-scala-and-
On 10/25/2013 03:50 AM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
It depends.
Two benchmarks of different languages and compilers:
http://togototo.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/benchmarking-level-generation-go-rust-haskell-and-d/
http://togototo.wordpress.com/2013/08/23/benchmarks-round-two-parallel-go-rust-d-scala-and
11 matches
Mail list logo
