On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 07:48:34 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 05:30:00 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 22.11.2013 00:52, schrieb John J:
On 11/21/2013 05:02 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 21.11.2013 21:25, schrieb inout:
On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 07:35:01 UTC, Volcz
On 2013-11-22 06:30, Paulo Pinto wrote:
that Google leaves to the developers the effort of
creating the JNI wrappers themselves, instead of providing a nice C++
API for them.
I guess they want their developers to use Java. Otherwise they would
have made C++ a first class citizens and not
On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 12:45:19 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-22 06:30, Paulo Pinto wrote:
that Google leaves to the developers the effort of
creating the JNI wrappers themselves, instead of providing a
nice C++
API for them.
I guess they want their developers to use Java.
On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 13:36:08 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I don't have any issue with Java and do like the language, but
it has lost its place if you care about portable code across
mobile platforms.
Ironic, much? :p
