Re: DCD 0.3.0-beta1 and DScanner 0.1.0-beta1

2014-01-31 Thread Brian Schott
New tags: https://github.com/Hackerpilot/Dscanner/tree/0.1.0-beta2 https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DCD/tree/0.3.0-beta3 DScanner Changes: * #90: Windows batch file out of sync with build script * #89: Infinite loop in identifier lexing function DCD Changes: * DScanner updated to 0.1.0-beta2 *

Re: OSCON speaking proposals due at midnight tonight!

2014-01-31 Thread Walter Bright
On 1/30/2014 6:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote: Lots of you have submitted speaking proposals for Dconf 2014. There's no reason whatsoever you can't present the same thing at OSCON, or even what you did for Dconf 2013. http://www.oscon.com/oscon2014 What are you waiting for? Sadly, it just

Re: DCD 0.3.0-beta1 and DScanner 0.1.0-beta1

2014-01-31 Thread David
P.S. Only the Textadept module has support for the new --symbolLocation and --doc switches. If you're one of the excellent people who wrote one of the other plugins, I'd appreciate your help adding support for these features to your favorite editor before a non-beta release is tagged. I adedd

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 2

2014-01-31 Thread Andrea Fontana
On Sunday, 26 January 2014 at 23:38:56 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: We've made a lot of progress towards the 2.065 stable release. Available binaries are as follows: All Systems http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0-b2.zip FreeBSD

Re: DCD 0.3.0-beta1 and DScanner 0.1.0-beta1

2014-01-31 Thread Jussi Jumppanen
On Friday, 31 January 2014 at 08:26:49 UTC, Brian Schott wrote: Textadept, Zeus, Sublime, and Kate are up to date as far as I know. All the updated Zeus scripts can be found here: http://www.zeusedit.com/z300/dcd_scripts.zip These latest scripts also include the first cut of a Doc Comment

Re: DCD 0.3.0-beta1 and DScanner 0.1.0-beta1

2014-01-31 Thread Jordi Sayol
New Dscanner v0.1.0-beta2 deb package available at d-apt: http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/ -- Jordi Sayol

Re: DCD 0.3.0-beta1 and DScanner 0.1.0-beta1

2014-01-31 Thread Idan Arye
On Friday, 31 January 2014 at 08:26:49 UTC, Brian Schott wrote: P.S. I'm still waiting for some brave/foolish Emacs and Vim users to step up and update the DCD plugins for their favorite editors. Textadept, Zeus, Sublime, and Kate are up to date as far as I know. I just completed the

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 2

2014-01-31 Thread Casper Færgemand
What's the point of the Windows installer? Does it make 64bit work out of the box? If so I'll definitely give it a go.

Re: So, You Want To Write Your Own Programming Language?

2014-01-31 Thread Kagamin
On Tuesday, 28 January 2014 at 00:48:48 UTC, Chris Cain wrote: It doesn't make sense for someone to walk up (or be given a ride to by a friend) to the DMV wait 30 minutes and once they do all the work to get the license say Wait, no, I refuse this after all. Pretty dramatic action, if he,

Re: DCD 0.3.0-beta1 and DScanner 0.1.0-beta1

2014-01-31 Thread Andrej Mitrovic
On 1/31/14, Brian Schott briancsch...@gmail.com wrote: Textadept, Zeus, Sublime, and Kate are up to date as far as I know. It doesn't really work for me using TextAdept 7.1 on Win7. A console window quicky pops up and vanishes when I press the period, or ctrl+enter (I'm assuming this is TA's

Re: DCD 0.3.0-beta1 and DScanner 0.1.0-beta1

2014-01-31 Thread Brian Schott
The popen function in Lua on Windows has been a pain for a while now. I think until a better fix is added to Textadept's process handling code I'm going to have to say that TA is not supported on Windows. If you do manage to make a SciTE plugin, let me know. On Friday, 31 January 2014 at

Re: DCD 0.3.0-beta1 and DScanner 0.1.0-beta1

2014-01-31 Thread Andrej Mitrovic
On 2/1/14, Brian Schott briancsch...@gmail.com wrote: The popen function in Lua on Windows has been a pain for a while now. I think until a better fix is added to Textadept's process handling code I'm going to have to say that TA is not supported on Windows. Fair enough, I don't really use

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 2

2014-01-31 Thread Manu
On 1 February 2014 06:33, Casper Færgemand\ shortt...@hotmail.com@puremagic.com wrote: What's the point of the Windows installer? Does it make 64bit work out of the box? If so I'll definitely give it a go. It's trying to. It works in many contexts, still a couple of loose ends. If it doesn't