On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 04:21:18 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I've got two posts complete[1]. Since C++ and D are exactly the
same for the majority of the code I'm only showing D and talk
of C++'s choice. While the rules governing D's behavior are
fairly simple I feel that I've expanded on the
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 07:32:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
What do you mean D does not provide a decltype?
typeof(cx) my_cx2 = cx;
I'll blame this on my poor knowledge of C++, at this time typeof
in C++ does not appear to compile, in the way I'm trying to use
it. I thought using typeof in C++
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 17:49:18 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 07:32:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
What do you mean D does not provide a decltype?
typeof(cx) my_cx2 = cx;
I'll blame this on my poor knowledge of C++, at this time
typeof in C++ does not appear to
I don't know how many people use unit-threaded
(https://github.com/atilaneves/unit-threaded) for their tests,
and of those how many use Arch Linux, but for anyone else there
for who that applies, I added a dtest
(https://github.com/atilaneves/dtest) package to the AUR:
Sublime integration update
http://dynamic.dlang.ru/Files/2014/Sublime-D-integration-plugin-linux-31-05-2014.zip
(only for 64 bit system)
Screenshot
http://dynamic.dlang.ru/Files/2014/87800e29-2dca-49c4-ae79-9f44a2dfe913.png
sorry, I will repost it's to actual thread.
Sublime integration update
http://dynamic.dlang.ru/Files/2014/Sublime-D-integration-plugin-linux-31-05-2014.zip
Screenshot
http://dynamic.dlang.ru/Files/2014/87800e29-2dca-49c4-ae79-9f44a2dfe913.png
On 05/30/2014 02:37 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
in which case
static if(cond) {
immutable:
}
int x;
should not create x as immutable if cond is true. The current
behavior is not consistent with attribute either.
Ugh, that is really bad. It shouldn't do that. Is that intentional?
On 5/30/2014 5:37 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 21:15:21 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 19:06:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Static if is certainly NOT an attribute, it doesn't make any sense.
Well... it sorta does. static
