On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 19:24:15 UTC, SomeRiz wrote:
Visual Studio like editor for TkD :/
Hmm... visual designers can usually build pixel-oriented GUI, tk
uses layouts, which work with code a little better.
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 03:42:11 UTC, David Bregman wrote:
I think the mulu implementation is incorrect. There can be an
overflow even when r = 0. For example consider the int version
with x = y = 116.
I also noticed this; another easy counter-example would be 132
for ulong
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 21:28:28 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 20:37:48 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
hmm well all string-mixins life at compile-time. So one can
print them out at runtime. Dump the source and put it into the
AST. Same for the results of static if, and
On 17/06/2014 07:21, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 16/06/14 16:00, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I sometimes tried to convince dynamic language proponents - the ones
that write unittests at least - of the benefits of static typing, by
stating that static typing is really just compile time unit-tests! (it
On 17/06/2014 20:59, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 19:48:42 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 17/06/2014 19:10, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 15:45:55 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Dunno about DScanner, but if it's being used in DCD, I'd guess it can
handle the whole
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 13:04:23 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Rather, simple fix changes that would be useful if the API or
syntax of the language changes. That's why I asked for examples
of dfix changes (even if for hypothetical language changes) -
to see how easily they could be implemented
On 6/20/2014 4:37 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 19:24:15 UTC, SomeRiz wrote:
Visual Studio like editor for TkD :/
Hmm... visual designers can usually build pixel-oriented GUI, tk uses
layouts, which work with code a little better.
While it's been awhile since I've used
On 6/19/2014 5:27 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I realized that it ought to be possible to allow a more direct drop-in
replacement for std.random by adding static opCalls to the classes which
were previously structs.
Thoughts on this, in favour, against ... ?
I'm on the fence:
Pro:
On 2014-06-19 20:47, SomeRiz wrote:
Thanks Gary.
Very simple :)
But i have a question.
All DLL file = How can i embed main.d file?
Use DWT [1], no additional requirements besides the system libraries ;)
[1] https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/dwt
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-06-19 14:16, Joakim wrote:
Sorry, I just noticed that you were only talking about HD quality. I
don't know where you're getting the 350 MB figure, as all the HD
recordings on archive.org are about 6-800 GB, but yeah, file sizes will
vary based on the type of HD resolution and encoding
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 21:44:16 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-06-19 14:16, Joakim wrote:
Sorry, I just noticed that you were only talking about HD
quality. I
don't know where you're getting the 350 MB figure, as all the
HD
recordings on archive.org are about 6-800 GB, but yeah, file
On 6/19/14, 5:16 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 11:04:25 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
My connection is specified to 10 Mbps. But it depends on how large
the files are. Most of the files from DConf are under around 350MB in
HD quality. On the other hand, Andrei's talk from LangNext
12 matches
Mail list logo
