Re: Beta D 2.067.1-b1

2015-04-22 Thread Namespace via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 at 07:53:57 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 at 07:18:36 UTC, ponce wrote: OT: How to know the list of D compilers available on Travis CI? Any release/pre-release is available, and it's now also possible to use the latest dmd, gdc, and ldc

Re: Calypso: Direct and full interfacing to C++

2015-04-22 Thread Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 21 April 2015 at 15:21:20 UTC, Elie Morisse wrote: So Calypso still can't load the MSVC C++ standard lib. I thought Kelly managed to build some STL examples but actually it's not remotely possible yet. The main blocker is that template instances often depend on each other (but not

Re: Beta D 2.067.1-b1

2015-04-22 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 04/22/2015 06:10 PM, Namespace wrote: Any changelog to compare 2067 and 2067.1? Just a few regression fixes, see the github comparisons in the OP.

Re: Beta D 2.067.1-b1

2015-04-22 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 at 07:18:36 UTC, ponce wrote: OT: How to know the list of D compilers available on Travis CI? Any release/pre-release is available, and it's now also possible to use the latest dmd, gdc, and ldc release by omitting the version suffix.

Re: Found on Reddit: It's time for D to own up

2015-04-22 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2015-04-22 00:18, Bill Baxter via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Anyone mentioned Automatic Reference Counting yet? Works pretty well for ObjC from what I've seen. This is basically ARC: http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP74 -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: Beta D 2.067.1-b1

2015-04-22 Thread ponce via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 at 01:32:47 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Also available on Travis-CI as dmd-2.067.1-b1. OT: How to know the list of D compilers available on Travis CI?

Re: dsource.org moved

2015-04-22 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2015-04-22 00:06, Stewart Gordon wrote: One of the comments there: Or you make your repository public, then everyone (who is not a collaborator) has read-only access And everyone who _is_ a collaborator has what? Push access (svn would call this commit access). I don't think