On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 01:52:34 UTC, Joseph Cassman wrote:
I was forced to install VS to get one since for some reason the
7A and 8.1 Windows SDK's did not install a complete 64-bit
toolchain for me.
Seems like Microsoft dropped the compiler from the SDK.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-u
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 01:55:35 UTC, Joseph Cassman wrote:
There is probably an obvious reason this is not possible but I
could not see it when reading through the MS licensing
information. It seems to me the linker bin could be
redistributed. Why is it (and the other required lib/dll fi
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 07:10:13 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
You're not allowed to redistribute the VS binaries, only the
libc dlls.
On Win32 we use our own libc (dmc) and linker (optlink).
We could improve our installer so it can optionally start the
VS compiler installation.
https://issu
On 2015-07-26 15:55, Martin Nowak wrote:
BTW, I'd like to phase out the fat 50-60MB combined zip, and add
tar.xz/gz for linux/freebsd/osx.
Does anyone still rely on the combined zip?
I noticed building the installer for OS X relies on that as well.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 01:55:35 UTC, Joseph Cassman wrote:
There is probably an obvious reason this is not possible but I
could not see it when reading through the MS licensing
information. It seems to me the linker bin could be
redistributed.
9. SCOPE OF LICENSE. The software is licen
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/nbuhouhimowvcqssv...@forum.dlang.org
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 07:10:13 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
You're not allowed to redistribute the VS binaries, only the
libc dlls.
On Win32 we use our own libc (dmc) and linker (optlink).
We could improve our installer so it can optionally start the
VS compiler installation.
If it only
On 2015-07-29 13:12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I noticed building the installer for OS X relies on that as well.
Never mind, I looked at an old version of the makefile.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 11:56:34 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 01:55:35 UTC, Joseph Cassman
wrote:
There is probably an obvious reason this is not possible but I
could not see it when reading through the MS licensing
information. It seems to me the linker bin could be
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 15:45:19 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
I guess what I mean to say is that they did it, maybe it can be
done.
Of course it can be done with an additional license agreement
with microsoft.
Of course VS Shell is still way more than is necessary for our
purposes.
On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 at 15:29:20 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
my book D Web Development, available now for pre-order:
https://www.packtpub.com/web-development/d-web-development
Thanks! I have pre-ordered your book though I'm currently playing
with Rust and Go.
The performance of D is pullin
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 07:16:39 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 07:10:13 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
You're not allowed to redistribute the VS binaries, only the
libc dlls.
On Win32 we use our own libc (dmc) and linker (optlink).
We could improve our installer so it c
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 18:13:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 15:45:19 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
I guess what I mean to say is that they did it, maybe it can
be done.
Of course it can be done with an additional license agreement
with microsoft.
Of course VS Sh
13 matches
Mail list logo
