Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 9/23/2016 7:30 AM, Joakim wrote: People don't just want speed and portability, they want ease of use. Show them that D will be easier. Fast code, fast!

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 12:59:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) I will; better yet let Mike do it (cc'd). Don't forget: 9 AM New York Time is the optimum.

Re: Diet-NG 1.0.0 released

2016-09-24 Thread WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 11:47:23 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: The Diet template language is aimed at providing a way to define procedurally generated HTML/XML pages (or other output formats), with minimal visual noise. Syntax and feature set are heavily inspired by pug

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobak...@forum.dlang.org Working on it in an hour,

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 17:42:10 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 17:42:10 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) I will; better yet let Mike do it (cc'd). Don't forget: 9 AM New York Time is the optimum. -- Andrei

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:13:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 12:59:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 9/23/16 9:28 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Could someone with big reddit rating please post the link there? (maybe Andrei?) I will; better yet let

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobak...@forum.dlang.org Working on it in an hour, with such a strong headline we should avoid mistakes.

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 16:55:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 13:18:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Thank you. Lets wait until Martin submit benchmark results too https://forum.dlang.org/post/mkmjxwilpvsggobak...@forum.dlang.org Working on it in an hour,

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 09/24/2016 04:37 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html

Re: Numerical age for D: Mir v0.18.0 is faster then OpenBLAS

2016-09-24 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 13:25:30 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: Mir is LLVM-accelerated Generic Numerical Library for Science and Machine Learning. Benchmark: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/glas-gemm-benchmark.html Still time for a few edits of that post?