Re: New (second) release candidate vibe.d 0.7.30-rc.2

2016-10-16 Thread Jack Applegame via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 19:57:09 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/commit/ab1ac33c564ad8d593104e30cc93eb1779c88d4a Plus some regression fixes for issues that got introduced since the last alpha release (not mentioned in the change log). The release has

Re: code-d 0.12.0 - The user friendly release (code-d for noobs)

2016-10-16 Thread bitwise via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 15:42:51 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 15:41:17 UTC, Dmitry wrote: On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 10:19:06 UTC, Wild wrote: After all Atom and Vscode are open source clones of Sublime. Sublime is fast, unlike Atom and VSCode. Yeah I noticed

Re: code-d 0.12.0 - The user friendly release (code-d for noobs)

2016-10-16 Thread WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 15 October 2016 at 18:54:32 UTC, bitwise wrote: On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 15:42:51 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 15:41:17 UTC, Dmitry wrote: On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 10:19:06 UTC, Wild wrote: After all Atom and Vscode are open source clones of

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

2016-10-16 Thread Uplink_Coder via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 10:58:57 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: That LLVM thing is surely nice to have but I highly doubt it will be allowed as dependency for DMD. --- Dmitry Olshansky LLVM is purely optional. A pure D interpreter exists. LLVM optimises most ctfe btw and returns

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

2016-10-16 Thread Uplink_Coder via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 08:34:06 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: No worries, I've been watching this space for over a decade. I really believe you are working on one of the most important parts of IT for the next decade. I am planning/making a library that uses CTFE extensively and feel

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

2016-10-16 Thread Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 10/16/16 2:27 AM, Uplink_Coder wrote: On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 08:34:06 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: No worries, I've been watching this space for over a decade. I really believe you are working on one of the most important parts of IT for the next decade. I am planning/making a library

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

2016-10-16 Thread Uplink_Coder via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 13:51:55 UTC, Uplink_Coder wrote: On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 10:58:57 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: That LLVM thing is surely nice to have but I highly doubt it will be allowed as dependency for DMD. --- Dmitry Olshansky LLVM is purely optional. A pure D

Re: [GSoC] Precise GC

2016-10-16 Thread Dsby via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 03:26:31 UTC, FrankLike wrote: On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote: Hi everyone, I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it is closer than it was to be