On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:59:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Many of you will already know this from the other thread or
from my twitter, but I just added a on-demand downloader to my
dpldocs.info domain to fetch and build docs for any* dub
Would be cool if you could add support for
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 10:55:38 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/28/18 12:54 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/25/18 8:03 PM, aliak wrote:
Did you take a look at
https://dlang.org/library/std/range/only.html? -- Andrei
Ah, sorry I missed that you mentioned it. -- Andrei
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 13:41 +, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> About a month ago, Sebastian Wilzbach sent an email out to a few
> of the core D folks asking for feedback on a survey he had put
> together. He thought it would be useful for the Foundation to use
> in order to
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 20:37:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 20:24:00 UTC, JN wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 20:01:16 UTC, Seb wrote:
Thanks! I hope so too!
Is there some way to access the results without retaking the
survey?
Yeah the link
Just don't overlook the fact that people who fill out 30 minute surveys
right away after being told about them are a self-selected group of people
who apparently have way too much time on their hands.
Which also suggests they would likely also have more free time to go chase
down and fix breaks in
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 21:24:29 UTC, Bill Baxter wrote:
Just don't overlook the fact that people who fill out 30 minute
surveys
right away after being told about them are a self-selected
group of people
who apparently have way too much time on their hands.
Which also suggests they would
On Thursday, March 01, 2018 13:24:29 Bill Baxter via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Just don't overlook the fact that people who fill out 30 minute surveys
> right away after being told about them are a self-selected group of people
> who apparently have way too much time on their hands.
> Which
Ok, I have same feeling, but after trying to fill this survey with one of
my colleague, I have find out that it takes "only" 15 minutes to complete.
But still I thing almost everyone from our field is OK with filling surveys
anyway.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Bill Baxter via
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 21:49:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That being said, I think that it's a given that we need to make
breaking changes at least occasionally. The question is more
how big they can be and how we go about it. Some changes would
clearly be far too large to be worth
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:39:08AM +, psychoticRabbit via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> On the otherhand, I wish programming languages would just stop
> changing so often.
[...]
Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine. :-P
The day a language stops changing is the day it
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 11:00:15 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Would be cool if you could add support for creating docs from
any dub project stored on github and not only the ones on
code.dlang.org.
That might be possible too.
BTW I just put the server code up on github
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 02:34:23 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 02:02:42 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
btw. I never said 'stop changing', I said "I wish programming
languages would just stop changing so often."
I'd also argue, that languages that are relatively
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 02:35:46 UTC, Meta wrote:
D1 -> D2 nearly killed D (can't remember which, but it was
either Walter or Andrei that have said this on multiple
occasions). A D2 -> D3 transition might generate a lot of
publicity if done very carefully, but more than likely it would
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 01:19:53 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Because it has not stopped changing. To wit:
K C (1978)
C89 / C90 / ANSI C (1989-1990)
The 1995 amendment to ANSI C (1995)
C99 (1999)
(Embedded C (2008))
C11 (2011)
T
btw. I never
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 02:02:42 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
btw. I never said 'stop changing', I said "I wish programming
languages would just stop changing so often."
I'd also argue, that languages that are relatively stable, are
far 'safer' than languages that constantly change.
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 00:53:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:39:08AM +, psychoticRabbit via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
On the otherhand, I wish programming languages would just stop
changing so often.
[...]
Change is inevitable, except from a vending
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:57:22AM +, psychoticRabbit via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 00:53:02 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:39:08AM +, psychoticRabbit via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
> > > On the otherhand, I wish
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 00:39:08 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 at 21:49:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
That being said, I think that it's a given that we need to
make breaking changes at least occasionally. The question is
more how big they can be and how we go
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 02:35:46 UTC, Meta wrote:
D1 -> D2 nearly killed D (can't remember which, but it was
either Walter or Andrei that have said this on multiple
occasions).
This gets repeated over and over again, but I haven't actually
seen any evidence for it.
But even if it is
If you guys have bug reports or feature requests, you can put it
on the github too if you like:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/dpldocs/issues
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 03:57:25 UTC, barry.harris wrote:
Sorry little rabbit, your are misguided in this belief. Back in
day we all used C and this is the reason most "safer" languages
exist today.
You can write pretty safe code in C these days, without too much
trouble. We have the
21 matches
Mail list logo
