Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-22 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 14:01:30 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: Hey guys, Following the D->emscripten->wasm toolchain from CyberShadow and Ace17 I created a proof of concept framework for creating single page webassembly applications using D's compile time features. This is a proof

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-22 Thread aberba via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 14:01:30 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: Hey guys, Following the D->emscripten->wasm toolchain from CyberShadow and Ace17 I created a proof of concept framework for creating single page webassembly applications using D's compile time features. This is a proof

Re: Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

2018-09-22 Thread Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 19:10:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Monday, September 17, 2018 8:27:16 AM MDT Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...] Honestly, I don't think that using a pragma instead of an attribute fixes much, and it goes against the idea of what pragmas are

Re: Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

2018-09-22 Thread Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 01:08:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Saturday, September 22, 2018 6:13:25 PM MDT Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...] Yeah, the problem has to do with how much you have to mark up your code. Whether you have @foo @bar @baz or foo bar baz

Re: Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

2018-09-22 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 8:40:15 PM MDT Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 01:08:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > On Saturday, September 22, 2018 6:13:25 PM MDT Adam D. Ruppe > > > > via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > >> [...] > > >

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-22 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 14:54:29 UTC, aberba wrote: Can the SPA code be released as a separate module for WebAssembly web app development? Currently the whole thing is not so developer-friendly, it was just the easiest way for me to get it up and running. Right now I am trying to

Re: Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

2018-09-22 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 6:13:25 PM MDT Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 17:43:57 UTC, 12345swordy wrote: > > If that where the case, then why not make it an actual keyword? > > A frequent complaint regarding D is that there are too many >

Re: Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

2018-09-22 Thread Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 17:43:57 UTC, 12345swordy wrote: If that where the case, then why not make it an actual keyword? A frequent complaint regarding D is that there are too many attributes, this will undoubtedly adding more to it. When I (and surely others like me) complain that

Re: Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

2018-09-22 Thread 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 23:07:22 UTC, Manu wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 13:55, 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Tuesday, 11 September 2018 at 15:08:33 UTC, RazvanN wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have finished writing the last details of the copy > constructor DIP[1]