On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 13:05:53 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
Whats wrong with "If you think that, you have another thing
coming."?
I've always understood it sort of like say your Father saying:
"If you think that [i.e. you can steal your little brother's
ice cream cone], then you hav
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 04:21:18 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
1. http://he-the-great.livejournal.com/52333.html
Note that in the following code:
import core.memory : GC;
int* pxprime = cast(int*)GC.malloc(int.sizeof);
version(none) assert(pxprime); // possibly zero
GC.malloc curre
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 22:09:06 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't mind it as much, because I'm not bingeing on the talks
and spreading out watching them instead, but it'd be nice to
see the talks I missed on the livestream and want to watch now,
rather than at some indeterminate date in the futur
I have two questions that I've come upon lately:
1) How was it decided that there should be implicit conversion
between signed and unsigned integers in arithmetic operations,
and why prefer unsigned numbers?
E.g. Signed / Unsigned = Unsigned
Is this simply compatibility with C or is there some
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 02:02:28 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 23:30:39 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
2) With regard to reducing template instantiations:
I've been using a technique similar to the one mentioned in
the video: separating functions out of templates to reduce
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 03:33:37 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
... I just tried this and I'm wrong. The qualifier isn't
stripped. Gah! Three different versions!
I could have sworn D did this for primitive types. This makes
me sad :-(
I guess you can make all kinds of code that depends o
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 16:51:56 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 28.06.2014 05:33, schrieb Peter Alexander:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 02:46:25 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 02:02:28 UTC, Peter Alexander
int a;
const int b;
immutable int c;
foo(a);
foo(b);
foo(c);
Thes
On Thursday, 3 July 2014 at 23:17:33 UTC, Jonathan Crapuchettes
wrote:
Last time 24 issues were marked as resolved by the community
(including
EMSI).
Please join us in squashing bugs on #d.
Is this primarily bug tracker culling or does it include PR
reviewing, debugging, etc?
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 16:00:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2a8xf4/dconf_2014_day_2_talk_4_reducing_d_bugs_by/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/881813965165619
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (please find and vote
quickly)
ht
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 22:40:02 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Outstanding regressions impeding release are:
It would be nice if back-end issues got some attention prior to
releases.
For example:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9465
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
On Friday, 8 August 2014 at 12:01:43 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
DMD v2.066.0-rc2 binaries are available for testing:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing
Probably too late but
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3826 is an ICE
& wrong-code fix which requires review (green au
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:18:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and
declare it yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what point-releases are for, though?
I agree, I think 2
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 00:14:59 UTC, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
On 8/20/14, 8:38 AM, safety0ff wrote:
I agree, I think 2.066.next should be the focus considering
the known
issues of 2.066.
Fear not, point releases will address known deficiencies.
Btw, thank you for the good work you'
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 01:54:55 UTC, Paul D Anderson wrote:
Is this expected behavior that has never been enforced before,
or is it something new?
And is anyone else having the same problem?
Paul
Looks like a regression, I've filed it here:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1
On Thursday, 28 August 2014 at 16:06:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Direct link:
http://nomad.so/2014/08/hidden-treasure-in-the-d-standard-library/
What do you have against capitalizing 'I' ?
It's annoying / distracting to read text filled with
uncapitalised 'I's.
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a "one man crusade".
It's not a "one man's crusade," it affects legibility and creates
dissonance within the text.
It also appear
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Stop being such a grammar nazi.
I didn't bring it up because I felt like being pedantic, I
brought it up as a suggestion to make it more pleasant to read.
Since you've already been labelled as a pedant, perhaps you
should
Just a correction:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 10:44:20 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
Since you've already been labelled as a pedant, perhaps you
should learn the difference between pedantry and Nazism.
I meant:
Since you've already labelled *me*
Anyways.
Thanks!
On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 12:13:14 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Last time people forced me to spend several hours on
reimplementing and debugging a BitArray implementation
Ouch.
src/tk/vec.(h|c) already contained an implementation.
On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 06:08:49 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
Feedback:
1. It will be aesthetically better if the edit/run buttons are
inside the code box, say just inside the right top corner.
I agree the button placement should be improved, I think they
should be immediately to the ri
On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 06:15:16 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
I agree the button placement should be improved, I think they
should be immediately to the right of "Examples:"
e.g. "Examples: [Edit][Run]"
Which makes it more clear that the examples can be run & edited.
I didn't see that th
On Tuesday, 27 December 2016 at 04:36:54 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
This version resolves a number of regressions and bugs in the
2.072.1 release.
I thought https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1707 was in
stable and slated for this point release.
I see at the bottom of:
https://github.co
23 matches
Mail list logo