Am 10.10.2016 um 12:45 schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
Am 10.10.2016 um 12:20 schrieb Martin Nowak:
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 09:03:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Of course, the new error is more restrictive than it should be, namely
if the uninitialized pointer field gets written before the first read,
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 10:45:37 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Would have been nice in theory to have real void initialization
of course, plus it was there for working around that (fixed?)
issue with slow compilation times for large static arrays, but
there is probably no real reason now to ke
On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 22:01:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 14:36:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Which branch changelog content is generated from?
Stable, the changelog is also included in the docs that are in
the packages.
I do merge stable back into master to publis
Am 10.10.2016 um 12:20 schrieb Martin Nowak:
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 09:03:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Of course, the new error is more restrictive than it should be, namely
if the uninitialized pointer field gets written before the first read,
it would still be safe.
That's surprising b
On 10/10/2016 12:28 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
It's on our heap and will be addressed soon.
Please look at our trello board.
https://trello.com/b/XoFjxiqG/active
These two 2.072 regressions seem to be missing from Trello:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16013
https://issues.dlang.org/sho
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 10:06:25 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Any news on the front of
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16574 ?
It's on our heap and will be addressed soon.
Please look at our trello board.
https://trello.com/b/XoFjxiqG/active
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 09:03:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Of course, the new error is more restrictive than it should be,
namely if the uninitialized pointer field gets written before
the first read, it would still be safe.
That's surprising b/c void initializers for struct fields didn't
On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 13:24:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Second beta for the 2.072.0 release.
We've fixed quite a few regressions, but some issues are still
open and
there will be third beta before the release.
Most notably we've fixed building of dmd on OSX, so you should
now be
able
There is an error [1] (caused by [2]) in taggedalgebraic, because void
initializers for pointer types are now invalid in safe code. The
question now is, is there any workaround that can be done in the
library, or will every library user have to fix this?
Of course, the new error is more restri
On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 14:36:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Which branch changelog content is generated from?
Stable, the changelog is also included in the docs that are in
the packages.
I do merge stable back into master to publish them though.
Which branch changelog content is generated from?
Second beta for the 2.072.0 release.
We've fixed quite a few regressions, but some issues are still open and
there will be third beta before the release.
Most notably we've fixed building of dmd on OSX, so you should now be
able to test the beta using brew.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
12 matches
Mail list logo
