On Wednesday, 23 June 2021 at 17:26:04 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
Hi Guys,
I recently gave a presentation (7 minutes since the conference
became very popular) introducing the D programming language to
the insurance industry:
Hi Guys,
I recently gave a presentation (7 minutes since the conference
became very popular) introducing the D programming language to
the insurance industry:
https://insurancedatascience.org/downloads/London2021/Session_4a/Chibisi_Chima-Okereke.pdf
Thanks
On 28 November 2014 at 06:40, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
weaselcat wrote in message news:rnlbybkfqokypxlgf...@forum.dlang.org...
I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does future
fall under?
Generally 'future
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 13:24:04 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:10:25 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
I know it's a tough call. But I do see these sorts of comments
regularly, and it is a
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 12:06:06 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 13:24:04 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:10:25 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
I know it's a tough call. But
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 15:27:19 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D.
Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll.
From the article:
The D programming language has quickly become our language of
choice on the Data Science team for any task that
Tomer Rosenschtein:
Awesome article.
Paper of the week is a modest word for this.
The D code is not good.
Bye,
bearophile
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tomer Rosenschtein:
Awesome article.
Paper of the week is a modest word for this.
The D code is not good.
Bye,
bearophile
But it was worth a reddit and hackerNews redirection:
look at that this fuckin genious who understand
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:18:09 UTC, Tomer Rosenschtein
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tomer Rosenschtein:
Awesome article.
Paper of the week is a modest word for this.
The D code is not good.
Bye,
bearophile
But it was worth a reddit and
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tomer Rosenschtein:
Awesome article.
Paper of the week is a modest word for this.
The D code is not good.
Bye,
bearophile
Maybe not good by the standards of this group, but it does
represent the efforts of someone doing 'real
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:31:19 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tomer Rosenschtein:
Awesome article.
Paper of the week is a modest word for this.
The D code is not good.
Bye,
bearophile
Maybe not good by the standards of
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:41:12 UTC, Tomer Rosenschtein
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:31:19 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tomer Rosenschtein:
Awesome article.
Paper of the week is a modest word for this.
The D
CraigDillabaugh:
Maybe not good by the standards of this group, but it does
represent the efforts of someone doing 'real work', so I think
it is worthwhile.
Perhaps part of the cause of the low quality of the code in that
blog post is the design of D language is not bondage enough.
This
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:57:31 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:41:12 UTC, Tomer Rosenschtein
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:31:19 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tomer Rosenschtein:
happy shabbat.
Shallom. See ya.
weaselcat wrote in message news:rnlbybkfqokypxlgf...@forum.dlang.org...
I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does future
fall under?
Generally 'future deprecation' means at least 6 months after it gets turned
into a warning. Often it's significantly longer, because
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 01:10:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/24/2014 4:50 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 00:34:30 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please
break our code
thread.
I would caution against
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 01:10:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I know it's a tough call. But I do see these sorts of comments
regularly, and it is a fact that there are too many D libraries
gone to seed that won't compile anymore, and that makes us look
bad.
Or this:
weaselcat:
I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does
future fall under?
For us that activate warnings in dmd (because for a design
mistake they are disabled on default, but hopefully this will be
fixed in future) in the latest github version of the compiler it
gives a
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:10:25 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
I know it's a tough call. But I do see these sorts of comments regularly, and
it
is a fact that there are too many D libraries gone to seed that won't compile
anymore,
Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D.
Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll.
From the article:
The D programming language has quickly become our language of
choice on the Data Science team for any task that requires
efficiency, and is now the keystone language for our
D is for Data Science by Andrew Pascoe
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2n9gfb/d_is_for_data_science/
Haven't noticed that it was already posted. Sorry about that.
The disscussion is here
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/qeyftagcvkhjjeeba...@forum.dlang.org
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 15:27:19 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D.
Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll.
From the article:
The D programming language has quickly become our language of
choice on the Data Science team for any task that
25-Nov-2014 00:34, weaselcat пишет:
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 15:27:19 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D.
Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll.
From the article:
The D programming language has quickly become our language of choice
on the
Dmitry Olshansky:
Why is File.byLine so slow?
Seems to be mostly fixed sometime ago.
Really? I am not so sure.
Bye,
bearophile
On 11/24/2014 2:25 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
[...]
Excellent comments. Please post them on the reddit page!
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 15:27:19 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D.
Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll.
From the article:
The D programming language has quickly become our language of
choice on the Data Science team for any task that
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 23:32:14 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
Is this related?
https://github.com/dscience-developers/dscience
This seems good too. Why the comments in the discussion about
lack of libraries?
https://github.com/kyllingstad/scid/wiki
25-Nov-2014 01:28, bearophile пишет:
Dmitry Olshansky:
Why is File.byLine so slow?
Seems to be mostly fixed sometime ago.
Really? I am not so sure.
Bye,
bearophile
I too has suspected it in the past and then I tested it.
Now I test it again, it's always easier to check then to argue.
Dmitry Olshansky:
Which is 1:1 parity. Another myth busted? ;)
There is still an open bug report:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11810
Do you want also to benchmark that byLineFast that for me is
usually significantly faster than the byLine?
Bye,
bearophile
25-Nov-2014 02:43, bearophile пишет:
Dmitry Olshansky:
Which is 1:1 parity. Another myth busted? ;)
dmitry@Ubu64 ~ $ time ./my2 log
real0m0.065s
user0m0.042s
sys0m0.023s
dmitry@Ubu64 ~ $ time ./my2 log
real0m0.063s
user0m0.040s
sys0m0.023s
Read the above
On 11/24/2014 7:27 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D.
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2n9gfb/d_is_for_data_science/cmbn83i
Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please break our code
thread.
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 00:34:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please
break our code thread.
I would caution against putting very much weight in Reddit
opinions - there's people who will never use D and just look for
excuses to
On 11/24/2014 4:50 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 00:34:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please break our code
thread.
I would caution against putting very much weight in Reddit opinions - there's
people who will
With algorithm.sort the deciles bench from the article runs twice
as fast(it's in the reddit thread)
I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does
future fall under?
36 matches
Mail list logo
