Re: Formal review of DIP1001
On 11/17/2016 06:35 AM, Dicebot wrote: Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness. Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review "to be include" -> "to include" (my bad, also propagated by copypasta in both responses). -- Andrei
Re: Formal review of DIP1001
On 11/17/2016 06:35 AM, Dicebot wrote: Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness. Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review "does nor argue" -> "does not argue" -- Andrei
Formal review of DIP1001
Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness. Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
