On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 18:06:45 UTC, Wild wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 16:18:56 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
Hi,
No worries :) Feel free to use whatever license you want. It
is your code.
However my point was that the code released with license other
than Boost (or similar)
On Sunday, 22 November 2015 at 21:05:29 UTC, cym13 wrote:
Heck, even the GPL is compatible!
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#boost
Hi,
No. It isn't. It is the other way around
"Boost Software License ... is compatible with the GNU GPL.". But
GPL is not compatible with the
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 14:44:09 UTC, Wild wrote:
On Saturday, 21 November 2015 at 11:34:57 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 23:35:58 UTC, Wild wrote:
Hey!
I have recently started working on a 64bit kernel ...
Hi,
Good to see more work in the OS area. I am even
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 16:18:56 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
Hi,
No worries :) Feel free to use whatever license you want. It is
your code.
However my point was that the code released with license other
than Boost (or similar) cannot be included in Phobos. That's
one thing. The second
On Saturday, 21 November 2015 at 11:34:57 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 23:35:58 UTC, Wild wrote:
Hey!
I have recently started working on a 64bit kernel ...
Hi,
Good to see more work in the OS area. I am even more happy
there is more developers interested in GUI
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 11:25:55 UTC, Wild wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 11:20:58 UTC, Rikki
Cattermole wrote:
Will you being going down the path of libc/posix compat layer
or straight up D all the way?
I want to go D all the way.
But if I have to get a libc, I will try
On Saturday, 21 November 2015 at 11:34:57 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
This is my general concern for all libs developed by the D
community. IMO license other than Boost is very cumbersome and
doesn't comply with the D core libs.
Just re-read the boost license and it says nothing about
On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 23:35:58 UTC, Wild wrote:
Hey!
I have recently started working on a 64bit kernel ...
Hi,
Good to see more work in the OS area. I am even more happy there
is more developers interested in GUI stuff. I have one
fundamental question though:
Is it possible for
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 11:20:58 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Will you being going down the path of libc/posix compat layer
or straight up D all the way?
I want to go D all the way.
But if I have to get a libc, I will try and implement one in D.
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 09:31:04 UTC, Luis wrote:
Nice!
https://github.com/Vild/PowerNex/blob/master/kernel/src/io/textmode.d#L64 not should be
"cast(slot[w*h] *)" ?
Fixed and pushed, Thanks!
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 03:04:49 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
So whats the plan?
- 32bit support
- ARM support
What else?
Well don't have a fixed plan on what I want to implement.
I might do 32bit, I have not decided yet, but I think I will skip
it.
I will not add ARM support
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 06:06:52 UTC, lobo wrote:
This project looks great and it's not easy writing a x86-64
bootloader even with GRUB and a reference to work from, Nice
work!
Thanks :D
On 19/11/15 12:19 AM, Wild wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 03:04:49 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
So whats the plan?
- 32bit support
- ARM support
What else?
Well don't have a fixed plan on what I want to implement.
I might do 32bit, I have not decided yet, but I think I will skip
On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 23:35:58 UTC, Wild wrote:
Hey!
I have recently started working on a 64bit kernel written in
only D (and a little bit of assembly where it is really needed).
I finally got it to boot today in 64bit mode. All it currently
do is just print some text and numbers to
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 11:25:55 UTC, Wild wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 11:20:58 UTC, Rikki
Cattermole wrote:
Will you being going down the path of libc/posix compat layer
or straight up D all the way?
I want to go D all the way.
But if I have to get a libc, I will try
Hey!
I have recently started working on a 64bit kernel written in only
D (and a little bit of assembly where it is really needed).
I finally got it to boot today in 64bit mode. All it currently do
is just print some text and numbers to the screen.
It uses Adam D. Ruppes minimal D runtime,
On 18/11/15 12:35 PM, Wild wrote:
Hey!
I have recently started working on a 64bit kernel written in only D (and
a little bit of assembly where it is really needed).
I finally got it to boot today in 64bit mode. All it currently do is
just print some text and numbers to the screen.
It uses Adam
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 03:04:49 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 18/11/15 12:35 PM, Wild wrote:
Hey!
I have recently started working on a 64bit kernel written in
only D (and
a little bit of assembly where it is really needed).
I finally got it to boot today in 64bit mode. All it
18 matches
Mail list logo
