Re: D on devdocs

2017-09-12 Thread ANtlord via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 21:03:53 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:

On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 03:23:47 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
Hello. I'm not sure that you know, but documentation of D 
language has become to devdocs.io. It is web service provides 
offline documentation. We've got a useful tool for 
documentation viewing and reading. The next step is an 
implementation of version support.


Don't compare anything to D. Use D.

http://devdocs.io/d/


Great work!
I noticed a small issue in the second example of 
http://devdocs.io/d/std_base64. Almost the whole code had the 
green (string) color. Maybe is there an issue with two strings 
seperated by a comma.


Kind regards
André


Ok, I'll I fix it as soon as possible.


Re: D on devdocs

2017-09-11 Thread Andre Pany via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 03:23:47 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
Hello. I'm not sure that you know, but documentation of D 
language has become to devdocs.io. It is web service provides 
offline documentation. We've got a useful tool for 
documentation viewing and reading. The next step is an 
implementation of version support.


Don't compare anything to D. Use D.

http://devdocs.io/d/


Great work!
I noticed a small issue in the second example of 
http://devdocs.io/d/std_base64. Almost the whole code had the 
green (string) color. Maybe is there an issue with two strings 
seperated by a comma.


Kind regards
André


Re: D on devdocs

2017-09-11 Thread Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce

On 09/11/2017 09:17 AM, ANtlord wrote:

> we should develop only one Scrapper

Ali's worthless contribution of the day: It should be Scraper.

Ali



Re: D on devdocs

2017-09-11 Thread ANtlord via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 15:02:17 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner 
wrote:
Do you know how much work would it be to reuse devdocs (I see 
it is open source) as a basis for hosting dub package docs)?


I'm sorry, but I can't assess required time because I'm not a 
Ruby developer. I have learned basics of the language to add D to 
the service. If we have the same format for every package 
documentation on code.dlang.org we should develop only one 
Scrapper. But I suggest asking for a Ruby developer to assess 
required time for the implementation.


Re: D on devdocs

2017-09-11 Thread Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 03:23:47 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
Hello. I'm not sure that you know, but documentation of D 
language has become to devdocs.io. It is web service provides 
offline documentation. We've got a useful tool for 
documentation viewing and reading. The next step is an 
implementation of version support.


Didn't know about it until it was mentioned in another thread 
here recently [1], but I do think this is great and I especially 
like their dark theme (clean, minimal).
Do you know how much work would it be to reuse devdocs (I see it 
is open source) as a basis for hosting dub package docs)?


[1] 
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.6556.1504522081.31550.digitalmar...@puremagic.com


Re: D on devdocs

2017-09-11 Thread Adil Baig via Digitalmars-d-announce
Bravo.

I don't know how many people actually use the service, but lots of
web/backend devs use devdocs. This puts D on their map and, hopefully, we
get attention from a much larger audience.

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:23 AM, ANtlord via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:

> Hello. I'm not sure that you know, but documentation of D language has
> become to devdocs.io. It is web service provides offline documentation.
> We've got a useful tool for documentation viewing and reading. The next
> step is an implementation of version support.
>
> Don't compare anything to D. Use D.
>
> http://devdocs.io/d/
>