On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:46:30 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:22:02 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
I'm not sure about any special syntax which is expected for
languages which have built-in sets. It would probably be
overkill to add syntax support, but I'm not sure how of
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:22:02 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
I'm not sure about any special syntax which is expected for
languages which have built-in sets. It would probably be
overkill to add syntax support, but I'm not sure how often
people use set literals or not.
E.g. Python has build
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 17:48:10 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
With regards to Sets missing from the language:
[...]
Sure, but even if it is simple, there should be some standardized
way to do this. To not force the people to invent the set
interface in every project again and again. And
On 9/9/16, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Wojciech Szęszoł has contributed a post describing his experience
> working on DStep for this year's GSoC. The post is at [1] and is
> on reddit at [2].
With regards to Sets missing from the language:
-
struct Set(T)
{
void[0][T]
