Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml progress
On 5/2/16 8:25 AM, 9il wrote: On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 08:45:59 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: Hi, Just a little update about my project... After days of bugfixes, the first almost-high-level API (XMLCursor) is now quite usable. Now I can start working on other APIs (e.g. DOM) based on it. If you're interested you can find some usage examples in files benchmark.d and test.d . Any comment is highly appreciated. (If you missed it, the repo is https://github.com/lodo1995/experimental.xml ). Thank you in advance. Lodovico Giaretta Hello Lodovico, Thank you for working on new xml. Please use size_t and sizediff_t instead of uint and int in your loops: for (auto i = 0; i < t.length; i++) should be replaced with foreach (size_t i; 0 .. t.length) It's not obvious, but you identified 2 different things here. auto i = 0 -> typeof(i) == int size_t i = 0 -> typeof(i) == size_t AND use foreach instead of for loops for simple index traversal. Note: foreach(i; 0 .. t.length) should correctly type i as size_t, there is no need to force it. -Steve
Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml progress
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 12:25:03 UTC, 9il wrote: Hello Lodovico, Thank you for working on new xml. Please use size_t and sizediff_t instead of uint and int in your loops: for (auto i = 0; i < t.length; i++) should be replaced with foreach (size_t i; 0 .. t.length) Best regards, Ilya I'll fix this. Thank you very much.
Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml progress
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 08:45:59 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: Hi, Just a little update about my project... After days of bugfixes, the first almost-high-level API (XMLCursor) is now quite usable. Now I can start working on other APIs (e.g. DOM) based on it. If you're interested you can find some usage examples in files benchmark.d and test.d . Any comment is highly appreciated. (If you missed it, the repo is https://github.com/lodo1995/experimental.xml ). Thank you in advance. Lodovico Giaretta Hello Lodovico, Thank you for working on new xml. Please use size_t and sizediff_t instead of uint and int in your loops: for (auto i = 0; i < t.length; i++) should be replaced with foreach (size_t i; 0 .. t.length) Best regards, Ilya
