On 25/01/2013 13:43, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-25 13:01, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
If I was going with that approach I likely would rather port the MonoD
parser since it looks just as good, if not better, and C# would be
easier to port to Java than D.
But the descent.compiler experience
On 2013-01-29 13:34, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Ah, fair enough. Yes, that could be an approach, although I dread a bit
the thought of having to interface D data to Java through a C API... it
might work though if one is carefull and manages to keep the interfacing
data simple enough (and leave the
On 25.01.2013 21:34, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-25 20:00, alex wrote:
I already suggested Rainer to make a native/non-native interface between
VisualD and D_Parser - this will probably happen via COM or so.. and I
dunno anything about that technique. I just can make sure that the
On 2013-01-26 01:23, alex wrote:
Why not wrap dmd's front-end?
The problem with the DMD frontend is that it's not made to be used in on
its own, like in an IDE.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 08:22:39 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 25.01.2013 21:34, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-25 20:00, alex wrote:
I already suggested Rainer to make a native/non-native
interface between
VisualD and D_Parser - this will probably happen via COM or
so.. and I
On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 11:46:27 UTC, alex wrote:
Concerning completion server...why not a completion server? :D
- I mean, it'll be launched as soon as VisualD launches..and
then you can pipe-through commands etc. to interact like it's
done the mspdbsrv already. That's imho even easier
On 26.01.2013 13:09, alex wrote:
On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 11:46:27 UTC, alex wrote:
Concerning completion server...why not a completion server? :D - I
mean, it'll be launched as soon as VisualD launches..and then you can
pipe-through commands etc. to interact like it's done the
On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 12:28:11 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 26.01.2013 13:09, alex wrote:
On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 11:46:27 UTC, alex wrote:
Concerning completion server...why not a completion server?
:D - I
mean, it'll be launched as soon as VisualD launches..and then
On 24/01/2013 13:25, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-24 14:12, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
That's a lot of continuing nice work coming out from there, impressive!
BTW, something I've been meaning to ask. I see that in Mono-D you've
developed a hand-written D parser. How long did it take you to
On 24/01/2013 15:11, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:12:31 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 21/01/2013 21:14, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
No, the entire formatting engine is NOT finished yet. :P
Anyway I've created a good compromise solution between releasing
stuff early and
On 2013-01-25 13:01, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
If I was going with that approach I likely would rather port the MonoD
parser since it looks just as good, if not better, and C# would be
easier to port to Java than D.
But the descent.compiler experience (parser ported from DMD's parser)
put me off
On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 12:31:12 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 24/01/2013 15:11, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:12:31 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 21/01/2013 21:14, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
No, the entire formatting engine is NOT finished yet. :P
Anyway I've
On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 13:43:46 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I didn't say anything about porting :) I was suggesting you
integrate the VisualD parser without porting it. That's why I
suggested the one in VisualD and not the one in Mono-D.
I already suggested Rainer to make a
On 2013-01-25 20:00, alex wrote:
I already suggested Rainer to make a native/non-native interface between
VisualD and D_Parser - this will probably happen via COM or so.. and I
dunno anything about that technique. I just can make sure that the
parser library is fully stand-alone, only depending
On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 20:34:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-25 20:00, alex wrote:
I already suggested Rainer to make a native/non-native
interface between
VisualD and D_Parser - this will probably happen via COM or
so.. and I
dunno anything about that technique. I just can
On 21/01/2013 21:14, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
No, the entire formatting engine is NOT finished yet. :P
Anyway I've created a good compromise solution between releasing
stuff early and having a fairly nice formatting result:
I just let the indenting engine calculate the indents of all
lines of
On 2013-01-24 14:12, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
That's a lot of continuing nice work coming out from there, impressive!
BTW, something I've been meaning to ask. I see that in Mono-D you've
developed a hand-written D parser. How long did it take you to write
that? Did you test it extensively or not
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:12:31 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 21/01/2013 21:14, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
No, the entire formatting engine is NOT finished yet. :P
Anyway I've created a good compromise solution between
releasing
stuff early and having a fairly nice formatting result:
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 21:35:11 UTC, alex wrote:
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 21:32:38 UTC, F i L wrote:
Thanks Alex, even though I don't use auto-formatting (I never
did like that).
I use it rarely either - but some others asked whether I could
do this - and now there it is :)
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 10:26:21 UTC, mist wrote:
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 21:35:11 UTC, alex wrote:
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 21:32:38 UTC, F i L wrote:
Thanks Alex, even though I don't use auto-formatting (I never
did like that).
I use it rarely either - but some others
I always define project code style policies in Eclipse code style
settings and run auto-format (Ctrl+Shift+F) on new code always
before commiting to ensure my nasty personal preferences have not
slipped out of subconscious. It also converts all whitespaces
consistently to match project
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 15:54:46 UTC, mist wrote:
I always define project code style policies in Eclipse code
style settings and run auto-format (Ctrl+Shift+F) on new code
always before commiting to ensure my nasty personal preferences
have not slipped out of subconscious. It also
Thanks Alex, even though I don't use auto-formatting (I never did
like that).
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 21:32:38 UTC, F i L wrote:
Thanks Alex, even though I don't use auto-formatting (I never
did like that).
I use it rarely either - but some others asked whether I could do
this - and now there it is :)
24 matches
Mail list logo
