On Tuesday, 1 April 2014 at 19:03:10 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Saturday, 29 March 2014 at 13:25:19 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
On Friday, 28 March 2014 at 22:50:32 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
I am having an issue with the windows installer :
Ok, so after investigations I partially fixed my problem
On Saturday, 29 March 2014 at 13:25:19 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
On Friday, 28 March 2014 at 22:50:32 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
I am having an issue with the windows installer :
Ok, so after investigations I partially fixed my problem :
- I have no idea why the installer tried to download with the
On Friday, 28 March 2014 at 22:50:32 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
I am having an issue with the windows installer :
Ok, so after investigations I partially fixed my problem :
- I have no idea why the installer tried to download with the
wrong URL, this should not happen, and on my own compiled
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 08:45:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains
complete descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes
for this release.
I am having an issue with the windows installer :
http://puu.sh/7NdXY.png
The URL
On 2014-02-25 22:51, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If the compiler generates opEquals and opCmp, then it's guaranteed
opEquals(x, y) is equivalent to opCmp(x, y) == 0.
The compiler should NOT complain about this, which I should have more
clearly stated (I thought I had).
Filed as [1].
Steven Schveighoffer wrote in message
news:op.xbs1naiueav7ka@stevens-macbook-pro.local...
A wild wild guess is that there was code in the compiler that used to
require it (after all, it was required a long time ago), and somehow it
got reactivated by accident.
But wild guesses don't help
On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 10:28:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Walter + Andrei did it, and it was completely intentional, and
it was known that it would break code.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3054
I find it so ironical that Walter warns that this may break the
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:28:42 -0500, Daniel Murphy
yebbliesnos...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote in message
news:op.xbs1naiueav7ka@stevens-macbook-pro.local...
A wild wild guess is that there was code in the compiler that used to
require it (after all, it was required a long
On 2014-02-24 21:29, Walter Bright wrote:
Looks like we need to do something about this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ytfc5/d_2065_released_with_396_fixes_and_improvements/cfnmkih
At a minimum, add it to the changelog. Or possibly remove that change.
I've been compiling
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 08:45:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains
complete descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes
for this release.
Nice job wrangling the new release schedule and shepherding your
first release out the
On 2014-02-24 21:29, Walter Bright wrote:
Looks like we need to do something about this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ytfc5/d_2065_released_with_396_fixes_and_improvements/cfnmkih
At a minimum, add it to the changelog. Or possibly remove that change.
Answering some of your
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:11:46 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would suggest a proper interim fix is to only reject key types that
define opEquals, but not opCmp. Then switch to using equals in druntime.
Sorry, I meant define opCmp but not opEquals. Some types can be
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 20:24:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/24/2014 9:48 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 17:42:07 UTC, Manu wrote:
First thing I noticed though, the Windows installer seemed to
forget where
my existing D installation is, and tried to install
On 2/25/2014 2:28 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Walter + Andrei did it, and it was completely intentional, and it was known that
it would break code.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3054
It was intended to only break code that was already broken (would fail at
runtime). It
On 2/25/2014 11:03 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 20:24:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/24/2014 9:48 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 17:42:07 UTC, Manu wrote:
First thing I noticed though, the Windows installer seemed to forget where
my
On 25 February 2014 17:30, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2014-02-24 21:29, Walter Bright wrote:
Looks like we need to do something about this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ytfc5/d_2065_released_with_396_fixes_and_improvements/cfnmkih
At a minimum, add it to the
On 2/24/2014 12:29 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Looks like we need to do something about this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ytfc5/d_2065_released_with_396_fixes_and_improvements/cfnmkih
At a minimum, add it to the changelog. Or possibly remove that change.
24-Feb-2014 12:45, Andrew Edwards пишет:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains complete
descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes for this release.
Available binaries can be accessed at [2]. Since the website will lag
slightly behind, links are provided below
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:33:05 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/25/2014 2:28 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Walter + Andrei did it, and it was completely intentional, and it was
known that
it would break code.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3054
It
On 2014-02-25 20:49, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I just wrote this and compiled on 2.064:
import std.stdio;
struct S
{
int x;
int y;
bool opEquals(ref const(S) other) const { return other.x == x;}
}
void main()
{
int[S] aa;
aa[S(1, 2)] = 5;
aa[S(1, 3)] = 6;
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:12:41 -0500, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
The thing is that the compiler complains about a deceleration looking
like this:
struct TagIndex
{
uint tag, index;
}
If the compiler generates opEquals and opCmp, then it's guaranteed
opEquals(x, y) is
On 02/24/2014 09:45 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains complete
descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes for this release.
(...)
[1] http://dlang.org/chagelog.html
Great news! Your changelog link has a typo, and it's not updated
\o/ Congrats! I'm excited for this release, it fixes a good
amount of bugs that have been plaguing me.
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 08:45:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains
complete descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes
for this release.
Awesome release!
Available binaries can be accessed at [2]. Since the website
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 08:45:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains
complete descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes
for this release.
Available binaries can be accessed at [2]. Since the website
will lag slightly
On 2/24/14, 3:45 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains complete
descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes for this release.
[1] http://dlang.org/chagelog.html
Correction: http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Note that this page is still
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 10:33:27 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
All Systems:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
FreeBSD:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.freebsd-64.zip
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.freebsd-32.zip
Linux:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 10:43:32 UTC, Francesco Cattoglio
wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 10:33:27 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
All Systems:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
FreeBSD:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.freebsd-64.zip
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by
default?
Correct. The pull for it is
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2895
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by
default?
Correct. The pull for it is
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2895
Clear,
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by
default?
Correct. The pull for it is
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2895
Clear,
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by
default?
Correct. The pull for it is
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2895
Not really.
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:45:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by
default?
Correct. The pull for it is
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:44:30 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by
default?
Correct. The pull for it is
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:45:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Not really. This pull introduce the virtual keyword. The next
step will afaik force you to write on every method if it is
virtual or final. The step afterwards will probably introduce
final by default.
Wait, does this mean we
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 08:45:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Windows:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0.exe
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.windows.zip
The .zip file for Windows isn't listed on the download page.
http://dlang.org/download.html
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 08:45:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available.
Cool.
I found two bugs in the comments to library changes point 2.
The 2nd comment says all values are not true but what the check
does is not all values are true.
Same for the
El 24/02/14 09:45, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available.
Congratulations for this new dmd release!
New deb packages and dlangspec in several formats available at
http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/
--
Jordi Sayol
On 2/24/14, 4:24 AM, Francesco Cattoglio wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:45:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Not really. This pull introduce the virtual keyword. The next step
will afaik force you to write on every method if it is virtual or
final. The step afterwards will probably introduce
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 17:37:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Arch packages have just been updated.
Thank You!
Mike
On 2/24/2014 9:48 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 17:42:07 UTC, Manu wrote:
First thing I noticed though, the Windows installer seemed to forget where
my existing D installation is, and tried to install it somewhere else.
I thought this got fixed months ago? Regression
Looks like we need to do something about this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ytfc5/d_2065_released_with_396_fixes_and_improvements/cfnmkih
At a minimum, add it to the changelog. Or possibly remove that change.
BTW it seems the copyright notice is outdated:
DMD64 D Compiler v2.065
Copyright (c) *1999-2013* by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
Documentation: http://dlang.org/
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Edwards rid...@yahoo.com wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available.
Great work! It warms my heart to see D improving at a steady
rate. I'm starting to use it on my next major project as it also
seems the IDE support (Mono-D) has improved too.
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:29:51 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Looks like we need to do something about this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ytfc5/d_2065_released_with_396_fixes_and_improvements/cfnmkih
At a minimum, add it to the changelog. Or possibly
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 21:00:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I think the change should go (if it was intentional).
IIRC, opCmp was required in D1 and older versions of D2,
because hash collisions were stored in a tree instead of a LL.
The documentation should be updated too.
On 2/24/2014 12:45 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains complete
descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes for this release.
Thank you, everyone, for this release! And a special thanks to Andrew who
stepped up to organize and manage
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 21:22:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
A wild wild guess is that there was code in the compiler that
used to require it (after all, it was required a long time
ago), and somehow it got reactivated by accident.
But wild guesses don't help fix bugs :)
In doing
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:09:39 -0500, Meta jared...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 21:00:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think the change should go (if it was intentional).
IIRC, opCmp was required in D1 and older versions of D2, because hash
collisions were stored in a
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:23:45 -0500, Meta jared...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I see. I got the impression that he thought it was a deliberate
change, which is why he was so irate. Maybe someone should mention this
in the thread.
I did, but I have a feeling it won't help :)
-Steve
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 18:58:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/24/14, 4:24 AM, Francesco Cattoglio wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:45:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Not really. This pull introduce the virtual keyword. The next
step
will afaik force you to write on every
Szymon Gatner, el 24 de February a las 11:48 me escribiste:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:45:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
So 2.065 is not the one that will make class
On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 00:09:45 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Szymon Gatner, el 24 de February a las 11:48 me escribiste:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:45:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC,
53 matches
Mail list logo
