Am Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:47:22 +0200
schrieb ilya-stromberg ilya-stromberg-2...@yandex.ru:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 19:02:45 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:58:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2013 13:48:16 Dicebot wrote:
On Monday,
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:58:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I confess that I don't understand why anyone is creating any
unit test
projects for D, and I'd likely vote against any attempt to add
such a thing to
Phobos. D has built in unit testing functionality, and it works
great. Maybe
On Sunday, 29 September 2013 at 21:06:16 UTC, linkrope wrote:
https://github.com/linkrope/dunit/tree/v0.7.0
The xUnit testing framework for D is used in production for one
year now.
Guys, we have at least 5 (!) different unit test projects!
Can you cooperate your efforts to create one, but
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:09:25 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
Guys, we have at least 5 (!) different unit test projects!
Can you cooperate your efforts to create one, but wonderful?
...and add it to Phobos review queue ;)
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:58:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2013 13:48:16 Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:09:25 UTC, ilya-stromberg
wrote:
Guys, we have at least 5 (!) different unit test projects!
Can you cooperate your efforts to create one,
On Monday, October 21, 2013 14:10:13 Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:58:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I confess that I don't understand why anyone is creating any
unit test
projects for D, and I'd likely vote against any attempt to add
such a thing to
Phobos. D has
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 04:58 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[…]
I confess that I don't understand why anyone is creating any unit test
projects for D, and I'd likely vote against any attempt to add such a thing
to
Phobos. D has built in unit testing functionality, and it works great. Maybe
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 12:24:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I know that you can extend the built-in facilities by
overriding how assert
works and the like.
Overriding assert is dangerous because changes behavior of
program itself and lacks context data. Own test runner
implemented
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 16:22 +0200, qznc wrote:
[…]
Somewhat off topic, but out of curiosity: How do you distinguish
between integration and system testing?
Integration testing is when you test part or all of the system but not
in a full deployment context (so possibly still using mocks for the
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 14:22:31 UTC, qznc wrote:
The descriptions I found usually sound like system testing is a
special case of integration testing, where you simply integrate
all components.
There is a certain terminology issue here as system testing may
apply to both certain
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:58:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2013 13:48:16 Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:09:25 UTC, ilya-stromberg
wrote:
Guys, we have at least 5 (!) different unit test projects!
Can you cooperate your efforts to create one,
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 19:02:45 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:58:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2013 13:48:16 Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:09:25 UTC, ilya-stromberg
wrote:
Guys, we have at least 5 (!) different
12 matches
Mail list logo
