On Friday, April 20, 2018 16:07:06 Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Friday, 20 April 2018 at 00:46:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Yes. I would have thought that that was clear. It throws if any
> > of the characters or sequence of characters in the argument
> > aren't
On Friday, 20 April 2018 at 00:46:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yes. I would have thought that that was clear. It throws if any
of the characters or sequence of characters in the argument
aren't legal in the text portion of an XML document. Those
characters that can be legally present in
On Friday, 20 April 2018 at 08:45:45 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Jonathan, are the interfaces in the dom module generated from
the IDL code from W3C?
It's not W3C DOM :)
On Friday, April 20, 2018 08:45:45 Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 April 2018 at 14:40:58 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Well, since I'm going to be talking about dxml at dconf, and
> > it's likely that I'll be talking about stuff that was not in
> > the
On Thursday, 19 April 2018 at 14:40:58 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Well, since I'm going to be talking about dxml at dconf, and
it's likely that I'll be talking about stuff that was not in
the 0.2.* releases, it seemed like I should get a new release
out before dconf. So, here it is.
dxml
On Thursday, April 19, 2018 23:00:03 Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 April 2018 at 14:40:58 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > I won't repeat everything that's in the changelog, but the
> > biggest changes are that writer support has now been added, and
> >
On Thursday, 19 April 2018 at 14:40:58 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I won't repeat everything that's in the changelog, but the
biggest changes are that writer support has now been added, and
it's now possible to configure how the parser handles
non-standard entity references.
In reference
On Thursday, 19 April 2018 at 14:40:58 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Well, since I'm going to be talking about dxml at dconf, and
it's likely that I'll be talking about stuff that was not in
the 0.2.* releases, it seemed like I should get a new release
out before dconf. So, here it is.
dxml
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 05:21:15PM +, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Am I right remember that this lib is planed to be included as std.xml
> replacement?
Yes. I'm really looking forward to that.
T
--
A linguistics professor was lecturing to his class one day. "In English,"
On Thursday, April 19, 2018 17:21:15 Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Am I right remember that this lib is planed to be included as
> std.xml replacement?
It is a potential candidate to replace std.xml. It is currently the plan
that once I feel that it's complete enough and
Am I right remember that this lib is planed to be included as
std.xml replacement?
11 matches
Mail list logo
