Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-12 Thread Sönke Ludwig
Am 10.02.2014 22:24, schrieb extrawurst: I gave beta 3 on my win32 dev machine a try today and noticed that building vibe.d (a dependancy in almost all my projects) takes noticeably longer to built. observing the process shows that beta3 consumes almost 1.5GB of RAM while dmd 2.064 'just' uses

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-11 Thread extrawurst
I gave beta 3 on my win32 dev machine a try today and noticed that building vibe.d (a dependancy in almost all my projects) takes noticeably longer to built. observing the process shows that beta3 consumes almost 1.5GB of RAM while dmd 2.064 'just' uses 1GB.

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-11 Thread Martin Nowak
On 02/10/2014 10:24 PM, extrawurst wrote: I gave beta 3 on my win32 dev machine a try today and noticed that building vibe.d (a dependancy in almost all my projects) takes noticeably longer to built. observing the process shows that beta3 consumes almost 1.5GB of RAM while dmd 2.064 'just' uses

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-09 Thread Kapps
On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:54:49 UTC, evilrat wrote: On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:37:20 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: Windows users, please give the new installer a try. It has been updated to facilitate proper installation. vc2013/win 8.1/winsdk 8.1 detects visual studio correctly,

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread Don
On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:34:15 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: Following are the changes incorporated since beta 2: The list of current regressions may be accessed here:

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread Rory McGuire
Ouch! Wonder why the auto tester never picked that up. On 7 Feb 2014 10:40, Don x...@nospam.com wrote: On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:34:15 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: Following are the changes incorporated since beta 2: The list of current regressions may be accessed here:

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread Francesco Cattoglio
On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 08:44:34 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: Ouch! Wonder why the auto tester never picked that up. On 7 Feb 2014 10:40, Don x...@nospam.com wrote: Because of no final by default?

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread Don
On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 10:00:50 UTC, Francesco Cattoglio wrote: On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 08:44:34 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: Ouch! Wonder why the auto tester never picked that up. On 7 Feb 2014 10:40, Don x...@nospam.com wrote: Because of no final by default? No. The bug has

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread Lionello Lunesu
On 2/4/14, 2:34, Andrew Edwards wrote: Installer ... These are the correct titles for the Installer pull requests: #52 add alternative download for dmd.${Version2}.zip #51 disable Audio and USB in VirtualBox #50 use lib64 for phobo64.lib and gcstub64.obj on Windows #49 only copy explicitly

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/7/2014 2:32 AM, Don wrote: No. The bug has probably always been present in the 64 bit DMD. Historically, a couple of optimizer bugs like this one have been discovered each year. It's in 32 bit DMD too.

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread Martin Nowak
On 02/03/2014 07:34 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_i386.deb Do we need separate libphobos2 debian packages? Until now I've never seen them on the website

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread Jordi Sayol
El 07/02/14 16:56, Martin Nowak ha escrit: On 02/03/2014 07:34 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_i386.deb Do we need separate libphobos2 debian packages? Until now I've never seen

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-07 Thread deadalnix
On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 19:20:05 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: On 2/3/14, 2:12 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/__dmd_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb is 404 for me. Linux http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0~b3-0_amd64.deb

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-04 Thread Kapps
On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 at 06:58:02 UTC, evilrat wrote: i have some strange behaviour when building with -O, if in short it reports taking address of interface as dereferencing null. error reported with 2.065 beta2 and beta3, but i don't remember if i had this on 2.064. any advices? here

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-04 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 2/3/14, 3:34 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote: On 2/3/14, 5:29 PM, Meta wrote: When installing on Windows, it lists the required space on disk as 0KB. That's something we can work towards fixing. But does it install? Is it working for you? Are you having any problems with it that needs to be

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-04 Thread Martin Nowak
On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 at 18:51:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Let's record that as a bugzilla issue. Thanks, Andrei https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12075

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-04 Thread Rainer Schuetze
On 03.02.2014 19:54, evilrat wrote: On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:37:20 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: Windows users, please give the new installer a try. It has been updated to facilitate proper installation. vc2013/win 8.1/winsdk 8.1 detects visual studio correctly, path to win sdk

dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Andrew Edwards
Following are the changes incorporated since beta 2: DMD Issue 10133 - ICE for templated static conditional lambda Issue 11993 - typeof(this) in constraint of member function template should reflect method qualifier Issue 11447 - Closure provide bogus values Issue 12016 -

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Andrew Edwards
Windows users, please give the new installer a try. It has been updated to facilitate proper installation.

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Tiberiu Gal
On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:37:20 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: Windows users, please give the new installer a try. It has been updated to facilitate proper installation. http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0-b3.exe returns 404

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Andrew Edwards
On 2/3/14, 1:34 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote: Binaries have been published: Linux http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_i386.deb Should be: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0~b3-0_amd64.deb

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Tiberiu Gal
On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:47:46 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: On 2/3/14, 1:34 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote: Binaries have been published: Linux http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_i386.deb Should be:

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Rory McGuire
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb is 404 for me. On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Andrew Edwards rid...@yahoo.com wrote: Following are the changes incorporated since beta 2: DMD Issue 10133 - ICE for templated static conditional lambda Issue 11993 -

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Andrew Edwards
On 2/3/14, 2:12 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/__dmd_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb is 404 for me. Linux http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0~b3-0_amd64.deb http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0~b3-0_i386.deb

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Rory McGuire
Thanks, ahh! its the tilde. Cheers, On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Andrew Edwards rid...@yahoo.com wrote: On 2/3/14, 2:12 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/__dmd_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb is 404 for me. Linux http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0~b3-0_amd64.deb

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/3/2014 10:34 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote: Following are the changes incorporated since beta 2: Thank you!

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Meta
On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:34:15 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: Following are the changes incorporated since beta 2: DMD Issue 10133 - ICE for templated static conditional lambda Issue 11993 - typeof(this) in constraint of member function template should reflect method qualifier

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Andrew Edwards
On 2/3/14, 5:29 PM, Meta wrote: When installing on Windows, it lists the required space on disk as 0KB. That's something we can work towards fixing. But does it install? Is it working for you? Are you having any problems with it that needs to be addressed?

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Meta
On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 23:34:28 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: On 2/3/14, 5:29 PM, Meta wrote: When installing on Windows, it lists the required space on disk as 0KB. That's something we can work towards fixing. But does it install? Is it working for you? Are you having any problems

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread Brad Anderson
On Monday, 3 February 2014 at 18:37:20 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: Windows users, please give the new installer a try. It has been updated to facilitate proper installation. Seems to work well here. I thought something was odd when I saw a flash of an attempt to download from

Re: dmd 2.065 beta 3

2014-02-03 Thread evilrat
i have some strange behaviour when building with -O, if in short it reports taking address of interface as dereferencing null. error reported with 2.065 beta2 and beta3, but i don't remember if i had this on 2.064. any advices? here is repro case(for simplicity use dub)