http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, wrong-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
--- Comment #9 from Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com 2009-08-14 08:03:44
PDT ---
By the way, the example Lars posted is not as obviously invalid, at least to
me. He passes a local variable as a template alias parameter. Docs say that
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
--- Comment #11 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-08-14 08:12:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #8)
Actually I'm not sure if this a bug or an easter egg. The current behaviour
of
template value parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
--- Comment #13 from Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com 2009-08-14 13:00:32
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
What I find very strange here is that when I compile my test case with DMD
2.031 specifying just the four attached files, it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
--- Comment #15 from Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com 2009-08-14 13:34:17
PDT ---
I do think it's valid, see my comment #9. According to the obj2asm, when you
pass a local var as an alias parameter to a template:
void foo() {
int i;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
--- Comment #16 from Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com 2009-08-14 14:05:39
PDT ---
Seems like this bug is an ice-on-VALID after all. All our examples boil down
to passing local variables as alias template arguments. Also it seems like a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3248
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
