[Issue 4275] New: Unexpected optlink termination when 'export' attribute is missing

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4275 Summary: Unexpected optlink termination when 'export' attribute is missing Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 4275] Unexpected optlink termination when 'export' attribute is missing

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4275 --- Comment #1 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2010-06-05 01:57:58 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=652) Optlink bug -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 2933] Cannot return const/immutable with contracts (out/invariant) enabled

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2933 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #1

[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-05 04:50:08 PDT --- Structs defined inside functions keep a hidden pointer field to the function they are into. If you return the array of nonstatic structs, the scope stops existing and this

[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 --- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-06-05 05:04:20 PDT --- So what? You _can_ have an array of closures. Why not an array of nested structs? The compiler should obviously allocate all variables referenced by the struct on the heap, just

[Issue 4276] New: CTFE error messages use random variable names

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4276 Summary: CTFE error messages use random variable names Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 --- Comment #4 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-06-05 05:10:24 PDT --- I just tested it, and it seems for nested structs, the compiler correctly allocates upvalues on the heap. The error message you're receiving doesn't make any sense. At least the

[Issue 4277] New: delegate reference wrong scope var value

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4277 Summary: delegate reference wrong scope var value Product: D Version: 1.057 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2

[Issue 4276] CTFE error messages use random variable names

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4276 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 4263] Header generation omits '@system' attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4263 --- Comment #1 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-06-05 13:00:25 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=653) Update the header generation to include missing @system and enum attributes There's likely other attributes that are missing. I

[Issue 4262] Header generation omits 'enum' for enum declarations

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com

[Issue 4263] Header generation omits '@system' attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4263 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #654|application/octet-stream|text/plain