http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
Summary: insertBack() for SList
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-07-04
02:40:40 PDT ---
Which complexity requirements? I understand that it can't do it as is because
that would be O(n). I was pointing out that it kept track of the last element
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4421
Summary: Union propagates copy constructors and destructors
over all members
Product: D
Version: 2.041
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4422
Summary: std.c.osx.socket and std.c.linux.socket cause symbol
conflict
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4423
Summary: enums of struct types
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-07-04
03:38:29 PDT ---
Ah. Good point. I obviously didn't think that one through thoroughly enough.
You could popBack() once, but that would be it. Scratch that idea.
However,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
Summary: Copy constructor and templated opAssign cannot coexist
Product: D
Version: 2.041
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #25 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-07-04 08:05:15
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
I just voted for it. It would be great if you could define some benchmarks by
which you assess the improvements your approach is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4425
Summary: More bells whistles for bitfields
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4426
Summary: assert(condition, string) fails in std.array.back
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-07-04
16:44:47 PDT ---
Well, like I said, the addition might not be worthwhile. It would complicate
some of the other functions somewhat. It's just that it would be a fairly
16 matches
Mail list logo