[Issue 4854] Regression(2.047, Mac only) writefln Segmentation fault if no globals

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4854 --- Comment #10 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2010-11-09 00:09:39 PST --- TLS is not supported by GCC on Mac OS X. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 4915] auto return type escapes function purity

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4915 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-09 00:14:32 PST --- Test case (should compile with no errors): pure nothrow @safe auto bug4915a() { return 0; } pure nothrow @safe int bug4915b() { return bug4915a(); } void bug4915c() {

[Issue 5191] New: Combination of pure and nothrow result in a function that does nothing

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5191 Summary: Combination of pure and nothrow result in a function that does nothing Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 5192] Pure function cannot access static __dollar

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5192 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 5125] Optional function purity/nothrowness

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5125 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-09 04:15:27 PST --- See bug 4974 for another usage -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4974] Cannot have pure constructor due to impure invariant

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4974 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-09 04:13:41 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) I rather like the idea of the compiler acting like all invariants are pure so that you can have pure functions and still be able to use stuff

[Issue 4974] Cannot have pure constructor due to impure invariant

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4974 --- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-09 04:33:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) As it is, marking an invariant as pure does seem to make it possible to have pure functions, but it eliminates your ability to print debug

[Issue 4974] Cannot have pure constructor due to impure invariant

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4974 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-09 04:40:16 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) You should be able to do printf-style debugging in ANY pure function. Do you mean something like this? pure void foo() { debug {

[Issue 3924] nothrow ignored in some situations

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3924 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4915] auto return type escapes function purity

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4915 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-09 05:26:29 PST --- oops, STCproperty shouldn't be in that list. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 5192] New: Pure function cannot access static __dollar

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5192 Summary: Pure function cannot access static __dollar Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 1351] Discrepancies in the language specification

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1351 Ellery Newcomer ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 1351] Discrepancies in the language specification

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1351 --- Comment #14 from Ellery Newcomer ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu 2010-11-09 05:24:55 PST --- and some of the keywords in lex.html seem to have gotten misaligned -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 1351] Discrepancies in the language specification

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1351 --- Comment #15 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-11-09 13:50:46 PST --- The keywords all look aligned to me. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 1351] Discrepancies in the language specification

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1351 --- Comment #16 from Ellery Newcomer ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu 2010-11-09 14:05:15 PST --- (In reply to comment #15) The keywords all look aligned to me. Curious. immutable, nothrow, pure, and shared are misaligned in the generated html -

[Issue 3339] template is not evaluatable at compile time error inconsistencies

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3339 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3079] dmd -H doesn't generate enum modifier

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3079 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1351] Discrepancies in the language specification

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1351 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 2616] Undocumented behaviour: part-explicit, part-implicit instantiations of function templates are accepted

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2616 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2994] Incomplete Predefined Versions documentation

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2994 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1466] Spec claims maximal munch technique always works: not for 1..3

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1466 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2392] Parsing ambiguity between function pointer declaration and function call

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2392 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-11-09 19:46:40 PST --- The disambiguation rule for is it a declaration or a statement is resolved by the rule if it looks like a declaration, it is a declaration. The behavior

[Issue 2392] Parsing ambiguity between function pointer declaration and function call

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2392 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2734] Ambiguity in tokenizing: _._ as a float literal

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2734 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3043] Template symbol arg cannot be demangled

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2406] Declarator2 definition error

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2406 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3104] [meta] Grammar mangles

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3104 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3118] Need a clear spec on how inapplicable attributes are handled

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3118 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED