[Issue 6994] Using explicit 'this' in template constraint causes an error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6994 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4725] std.algorithm.sum()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4725 --- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-11-24 02:39:05 PST --- In Fortran 90+ c'e' una sum(): http://www.nsc.liu.se/~boein/f77to90/a5.html#section14 I think sum() needs a specialization for things like float[4], int[4], double[4],

[Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 --- Comment #8 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2011-11-24 04:14:00 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) I believe the correct solution is to make const/immutable fields with initializers into static members. Changing this would alter the

[Issue 2095] covariance w/o typechecks = bugs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 2095] covariance w/o typechecks = bugs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095 --- Comment #33 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2011-11-24 10:25:14 PST --- Terrific! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4687] Strange error on simple main with response file from xfbuild

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4687 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7000] missing import of std.stdio in std.regex?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7000 --- Comment #1 from Richard Webb we...@beardmouse.org.uk 2011-11-24 10:34:54 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/329 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6999] parsing error for inout method/ wrong headergen

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6999 --- Comment #1 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2011-11-24 11:44:51 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/531 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 7001] New: std.path.baseName and isValidFilename wrong documentation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7001 Summary: std.path.baseName and isValidFilename wrong documentation Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 7001] std.path.baseName and isValidFilename wrong documentation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7001 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 13:00:44 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) Returns the name of a file, without any leading directory and with an optional suffix chopped off. It should be:

[Issue 7002] New: std.path needs a isValidFilePath function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7002 Summary: std.path needs a isValidFilePath function Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 6872] Breaking type parsing of shared(inout(int)[])

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6872 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1

[Issue 6997] 64bit optimizer bug

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6997 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7003] New: no tuple expansion for c++ mangling

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7003 Summary: no tuple expansion for c++ mangling Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 259] Comparing signed to unsigned does not generate an error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 259] Comparing signed to unsigned does not generate an error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259 --- Comment #22 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-11-24 19:25:19 PST --- (In reply to comment #21) But druntime and Phobos will probably need some changes. Keeping this as a warning in the current compiler, and turn it into an (deprecated)