[Issue 7928] Regex regression - out of memory.

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7928 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7922] alias this causes weird formatting issues for strings

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7922 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, wrong-code

[Issue 7921] Two order of magnitude file size increase (up to 111 MiB for GtkD) mostly from zeroes

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7921 --- Comment #4 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-04-17 11:09:30 MSD --- (In reply to comment #3) Make sure first that it is not this issue: http://dlang.org/faq.html#bss AFAIK there was no changes with BSS in dmd 2.058. And GtkD

[Issue 7928] Regex regression - out of memory.

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7928 --- Comment #2 from Vincent thor...@gmail.com 2012-04-17 00:16:55 PDT --- It might be the case that you use ctRegex... Function 'regex' returns Regex object, not ctRegex. BUT my feeling is that long compiling of my small program caused by

[Issue 7921] Two order of magnitude file size increase (up to 111 MiB for GtkD) mostly from zeroes

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7921 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7928] Regex regression - out of memory.

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7928 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-04-17 00:20:35 PDT --- Aha, I think I know what it is! Give me the prize ;) Don't you have globals defined like this? auto httpReqRegex =

[Issue 7824] isInputRange fails to recognize inout(T)[]

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7824 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 7928] Regex regression - out of memory.

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7928 --- Comment #4 from Vincent thor...@gmail.com 2012-04-17 00:49:18 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Aha, I think I know what it is! Give me the prize ;) Don't you have globals defined like this? Yep, OF COURSE I made 'em global! Take your

[Issue 7418] Overloading doesn't work with aliases declared inside templates

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7418 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1

[Issue 7874] [CTFE] internal error: unsupported assignment (x OP= y) = z

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7874 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 7921] Two order of magnitude file size increase (up to 111 MiB for GtkD) mostly from zeroes

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7921 Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1091|0 |1 is

[Issue 7810] ctRegex!`a|b` asserts at regex.d:1150

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7810 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7919] Sample code works on GDC but fails with DMD

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7919 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 7854] Non-C attributes allowed on extern(C) function parameters

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7854 --- Comment #10 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-04-17 02:03:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #6) I'm not exactly talking about binding or calling convention, I'm more talking about types. To me, the two

[Issue 7921] Two order of magnitude file size increase (up to 111 MiB for GtkD) mostly from zeroes

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7921 --- Comment #7 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-04-17 13:07:46 MSD --- The example with built binaries for dmd 2.057 and dmd 2.058 (~10 MiB, uncompressed ~250 MiB): http://deoma-cmd.ru/files/other/huge-build-gtkD-full.7z One can

[Issue 7440] ctRegex does not work when using alternatives ('|') involving a '+' inside non-capturing group ('(?:…)')

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7440 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-04-17 02:08:05 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1095) Stripped down regex parser #2 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 7440] ctRegex does not work when using alternatives ('|') involving a '+' inside non-capturing group ('(?:…)')

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7440 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7442] ctRegex!`\p{Letter}` uses a lot memory in compilation

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7442 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-04-17 04:26:21 PDT --- I investigated this further and conclude that there are 2 factors at work. I removed few thousands of codepoints from Letter, so it doesn't run out of RAM

[Issue 7442] ctRegex!`\p{Letter}` uses a lot memory in compilation

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7442 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-04-17 04:35:31 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1096) Benchmark unicode Trie Benchmark runs core part of parse step with huge character classes. Currently it chokes on 2

[Issue 6758] std.c.stdarg problems with 8 or more integer arguments on x86_64

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6758 --- Comment #10 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-04-17 06:33:40 PDT --- The problem is worse than I thought. cod1.c, line 2450, cdfunc() puts an array parameter into registers, instead of the stack, if there are enough free registers.

[Issue 7932] New: protected method

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7932 Summary: protected method Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 7704] RangeError when using key optainey by AA byKey() iteration

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7704 --- Comment #2 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-04-17 08:18:16 PDT --- Now that 2.059 is out, could you re-test this bug to see if it has been fixed? I believe what you're seeing is the same as bug 7512, which has been fixed. Thanks! --

[Issue 7933] New: Illegal interaction of templates

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7933 Summary: Illegal interaction of templates Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 7917] -inline option fails for complex expressions

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7917 --- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-04-17 11:15:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) As far as I can see in the time available any further reduction loses the error message. A first reduction: import std.algorithm: map; import

[Issue 7917] -inline option fails for complex expressions

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7917 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-04-17 11:37:14 PDT --- I am hitting the same Internal error: toir.c 178 even without -inline with this reduced code: import std.algorithm: sort; struct Foo(int m) { int x; } void bar(int

[Issue 6253] Refuse definition too of impossible associative arrays

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6253 --- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-04-17 13:35:45 PDT --- One more comment: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.1834.1334688099.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com#post-wnepqlefxamfbhddpaqs:40forum.dlang.org This bug report is

[Issue 4725] std.algorithm.sum()

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4725 --- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-04-17 14:14:24 PDT --- See also Issue 7934 for an extra improvement. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 7934] New: std.algorithm.sum and std.algorithm.reduce for fixed size arrays too

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7934 Summary: std.algorithm.sum and std.algorithm.reduce for fixed size arrays too Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 7935] New: Struct-by-pointer field access in TypeTuple

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7935 Summary: Struct-by-pointer field access in TypeTuple Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: minor

[Issue 7933] Illegal interaction of templates

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7933 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 7931] Error message with _error_ with var[1,2]

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7931 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-17 20:37:55 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7931] Error message with _error_ with var[1,2]

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7931 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-17 20:38:14 PDT --- Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7931] Error message with _error_ with var[1,2]

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7931 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7932] Corrupted argument inside out contract for protected methods when compiling with -O in x86_64

2012-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7932 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---