[Issue 8237] Error message with _error_ when using failed type inference in template parameter

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8237 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3825] AAs entries are default initialized before the new value is evaluated

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3825 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-06-21 00:10:43 PDT --- Yesterday I've wasted some hours to locate this problem again in one of my programs. I hope this bug will be fixed. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6652] foreach parameter with number range is always ref

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6652 --- Comment #19 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-06-21 08:32:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #18) How about? Sounds great. It doesn't break code and allows us to fix this finally. foreach (i, item; array) Yeah, it should apply to

[Issue 6652] foreach parameter with number range is always ref

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6652 --- Comment #20 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-06-21 08:35:11 PDT --- (In reply to comment #19) (In reply to comment #18) How about? Sounds great. It doesn't break code and allows us to fix this finally. foreach (i, item;

Re: [Issue 6652] New: foreach parameter with number range is always ref

2012-06-21 Thread IK
foreach parameter with number range is always ref I noticed this by getting into infinite loops. But that, more than anything, hints of very bad programming style. :)

[Issue 8277] New: Missed implicit cast with fixed size array

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8277 Summary: Missed implicit cast with fixed size array Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 8278] New: std.range.chunks for generic Forward Ranges too?

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8278 Summary: std.range.chunks for generic Forward Ranges too? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 8279] New: Potential small improvement for std.conv.parse arguments

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8279 Summary: Potential small improvement for std.conv.parse arguments Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7965 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-06-21 12:35:20 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 8220] invalid function call not detected during semantic analysis

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8220 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6652] foreach parameter with number range is always ref

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6652 --- Comment #21 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-06-21 14:21:51 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 8220] invalid function call not detected during semantic analysis

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8220 --- Comment #9 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2012-06-21 14:34:32 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) This example has been around a long time, and I've been telling people that that's the way to do it. I'm really reluctant to break it,

[Issue 8220] invalid function call not detected during semantic analysis

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8220 --- Comment #8 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-06-21 14:30:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) This example has been around a long time, and I've been telling people that that's the way to do it. I'm really reluctant to break it, The behaviour

[Issue 8220] invalid function call not detected during semantic analysis

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8220 --- Comment #10 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2012-06-21 14:41:40 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) alias typeof(meter*meter) Area; alias typeof(meter*meter*meter) Volume; alias

[Issue 8220] invalid function call not detected during semantic analysis

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8220 --- Comment #11 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2012-06-21 14:46:24 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) This example has been around a long time, and I've been telling people that that's the way to do it. I'm

[Issue 8220] invalid function call not detected during semantic analysis

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8220 --- Comment #12 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-06-21 16:00:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) This example has been around a long time, and I've been telling people that that's the

[Issue 8280] New: std.array.uninitializedArrayExtend

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8280 Summary: std.array.uninitializedArrayExtend Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 7659] std.stdio.File.close() erases file.name

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7659 1100110 10equa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||10equa...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 7659] std.stdio.File.close() erases file.name

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7659 --- Comment #5 from 1100110 10equa...@gmail.com 2012-06-21 18:43:01 PDT --- I encountered this bug, or a similar variant. I can't decide if I just won the lottery, or if it's reproducable... I couldn't reproduce it, but I might be missing

[Issue 7659] std.stdio.File.close() erases file.name

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7659 --- Comment #4 from 1100110 10equa...@gmail.com 2012-06-21 18:41:39 PDT --- I encountered this bug, or a similar variant. I can't decide if I just won the lottery, or if it's reproducable... I couldn't reproduce it, but I might be missing

[Issue 8182] with a lazy struct parameter, the struct's destructor is called on the generated delegate

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8182 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-06-21 20:24:10 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 8182] with a lazy struct parameter, the struct's destructor is called on the generated delegate

2012-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8182 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED