[Issue 11888] Incorrect behaviour taking slice from return value

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11888 --- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-01-09 23:15:27 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Isn't this an issue mutating and using a parameter in a same "function"? Ah. I just stumbled on the thread. I see Andrei commented that: "Evalua

[Issue 11888] Incorrect behaviour taking slice from return value

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11888 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- C

[Issue 11888] Incorrect behaviour taking slice from return value

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11888 Manu changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical --- Comment #1 from Manu 2014-01-09

[Issue 11888] New: Incorrect behaviour taking slice from return value

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11888 Summary: Incorrect behaviour taking slice from return value Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11447] Closure provide bogus values

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11447 --- Comment #10 from deadalnix 2014-01-09 20:55:22 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > REOPENING. > > > > Code supplied in comment 2 still fail as follow : > > > > a.o:(.tbss+0x0): d�finitions multiples de � > >

[Issue 11447] Closure provide bogus values

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11447 --- Comment #11 from Kenji Hara 2014-01-09 21:14:52 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) > Just tried with the latest git master. Last commit : > > commit 41ebb59707444b8e2b0b03a77ec45c6856c7dda8 > Merge: 67c7551 59ba51e > Author: Iain Buclaw

[Issue 11886] "cannot access frame" error on lambda in lambda

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11886 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid | Severity|regression

[Issue 11887] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1288 in file 'glue.c'

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11887 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11404] ICE on using TypeTuple for AA values

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||purema...@zoadian.de --- Comment #4 fro

[Issue 11887] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 1288 in file 'glue.c'

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11887 Summary: Assertion failure: '0' on line 1288 in file 'glue.c' Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 11886] New: "cannot access frame" error on lambda in lambda

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11886 Summary: "cannot access frame" error on lambda in lambda Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: regres

[Issue 10959] std.algorithm.remove is highly bug-prone

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10959 Damian changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian...@hotmail.co.uk --- Comment #7 from

[Issue 11789] No setAttributes to complement getAttributes

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11789 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-01-09 10:32:35 PST --- Commit pushed to 2.065 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/55c83ed471c93f9912ca8f5b2c7822556

[Issue 5109] some advise

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5109 galaxylang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 11885] New: ICE(s2ir.c 359) with continuing a labeled ByLine (range struct w/ dtor) loop

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11885 Summary: ICE(s2ir.c 359) with continuing a labeled ByLine (range struct w/ dtor) loop Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW K

[Issue 5109] some advise

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5109 christ...@nerdtools.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christ...@nerdtools.de --- C

[Issue 10959] std.algorithm.remove is highly bug-prone

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10959 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-01-09 03:11:59 PST --- In Python to remove an item from an array (list) you use: >>> items = [10, 20, 30, 20] >>> items.remove(20) >>> items [10, 30, 20] With D+Phobos you need: void main() {

[Issue 3749] cannot evaluate yl2x (log) and exp functions at compile time

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 --- Comment #16 from Iain Buclaw 2014-01-09 03:04:44 PST --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > > We don't implement y2lx in GDC, so it uses the !INLINE_Y2LX > > implemenatation. :) > > At runtime? I'm quite surprise

[Issue 9756] "duplicate COMDAT" with templated functions in static foreach

2014-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9756 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de --- Comment #1 f