https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #16 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-21 01:44:56 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Why is reduce (sorry, fold) allowing multiple function arguments in the first
place?
If you want to compose functions to avoid another O(n)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12427
Summary: Regression (2.066 git-head): Building druntime fails
with -debug=PRINTF
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #17 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-21 01:51:41 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Furthermore, it also improves usability by making the seeds passed by
parameter pack, instead of forcing the use of a tuple.
OK. (Despite
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12427
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
Summary: Regression (2.066 git-head): toUpper is corrupting
input data (modifying immutable strings)
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #18 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-21 03:46:15 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
it would be possible to make `Tuple` and
`args...` co-exist as input argument style. EG:
r = a.fold!(a + b, a + b * b)(0.0, 0.0); //OK!
r
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #19 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-21 04:03:46 PDT ---
See also Issue 10670
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5325
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5074
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5881
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #20 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-21 05:07:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
What I don't like is to give only 1 single scalar argument if you have N
functions and then implicitly multiply the single seed N times.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5074
--- Comment #8 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-21 05:18:13 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
It doesn't have to! If array is pure, takes some form of const(int)[], and
returns int[] then the result will implicitly convert to immutable!
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5881
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #21 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-21 05:32:04 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
I'm not sure it's a fair reference, because Phobos doesn't do anything, it
just provides function. I'd be willing to bet there is a fair
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5074
--- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-21 05:36:04 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
It doesn't have to! If array is pure, takes some form of const(int)[], and
returns int[] then the result will implicitly convert to immutable!
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12429
Summary: SIMD vector type errors are too eager
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12430
Summary: non compile-time __simd opcode causes ICE
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12431
Summary: SIMD vector in struct ICE
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12427
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-21 08:30:55 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12427
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12432
Summary: cryptic error using splitter in foreach
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #34 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-21 10:47:49 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
Summary: Allow forward referencing IFTI types in template
argument list
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12113
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12432
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12434
Summary: std.algorithm.sum of immutable array too
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
--- Comment #2 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2014-03-22
00:53:42 MSK ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I.e. you must read the C API documentation about what happens to those passed
in pointer to data.
I'm talking about
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12435
Summary: std.range.transposed for immutable matrix too
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12436
Summary: Opaque struct parameter type should not be allowed
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12436
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-03-21
15:38:16 PDT ---
There are various other cases not caught yet, even for return types which are
partially checked now. Examples:
-
struct S;
S ret_f1(); //
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12436
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12437
Summary: ICE when passing undefined type to function pointer
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12436
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-03-21
17:09:08 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I would point out that references to opaque structs should compile.
In your examples:
S[]
S[]*
Should compile,
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12437
Michael M michaelpm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
36 matches
Mail list logo
